separate diseases

[Jayne Evans ae]

Is this the same thought as in PN Banerjee's book "Chronic Disease it's
cause and cure" where he talks of taking the case and sorting the
symptoms so you have a workable picture of *what to treat first*. He
explains to sort out which miasm is presenting most acutely say a
sycosis, treat this. Then the symptoms picture clears a bit and the psoric
miasm may be more prominant so you treat that. Maybe even going back
and forth as the patient starts to heal of their chronic condition(s). He
writes that if you try to include *all* the symptoms of *all* the miasms that
may be present that you will never find the simillium.
To me it seems that you should group the symptoms and treat as *small
parcels*.

Jayne Evans
BIH Dip student
Abu Dhabi UAE

[Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD]

I read that book ages ago........... cannot really remember, but I
suppose something has stuck in my mind........

Anyway, it is a way in difficult cases; it is actually a Cartesian
approach, where you divide the problem in smaller tasks, then
reconstitute the whole> Unfortunately, today's Cartesians forget the
last part of the equation.......

Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".