practicing.
As for seeing the difference, well, my parents always told me that
masturbating would cause blindness, so I guess they were
right........... ROTFL
)Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, Message: 18, Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002
-
Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Dr. J. Rozencwajg, Message: 18, Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002
Definitely not from Kent........ could not be farther from his way of
practicing.
As for seeing the difference, well, my parents always told me that
masturbating would cause blindness, so I guess they were
right........... ROTFL)
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".
practicing.
As for seeing the difference, well, my parents always told me that
masturbating would cause blindness, so I guess they were
right........... ROTFL
)Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, Message: 18, Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002
Hope you are feeling better after you masturbated intellectually. Is this
intellectual offering somewhere from Kent?
Alternation of remedies is only in acute cases, and only in those who are
preparing to see some intellectual M.D. the next day. About the interval,
it varies from patient to patient and no set rules...just as the
alternating of more than one remedies, is not true homoeopathy, so is the
mentioning of this interval. Doing something besides the set principles
does not make room to leave the entire doctrine. Mixing two remedies in one
bottle and giving them independently are two different aspects. Hope you
see the difference when you recover from your masturbating intellect.
Zaidee
Message: 24
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:04:00 +1300
From: "Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD."
Subject: RE: Re: Protocol, Message: 18, Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002
You are saying that there is no problem in giving different remedies in
succession "with an interval", as opposed to mixing them in the same
bottle.
So what is the appropriate interval that will not cause confusion in the
VF, as you say.
12 hours? 8 hours? 1 hour? 5 minutes? 1 minute? 1 second? 1 millisecond?
1 nanosecond?
I am not talking about acute cases where the picture can change rapidly,
so you have to change the remedy.......
If you want to give more than one remedy for a
disease/condition/patient, and I personally do not see anything wrong
with that when it is indicated, how, on what base, do you determine the
interval? And if the interval can be anything, the difference in time
for 2 different "bits" or "quantas" of information to hit the same
target (i.e. the difference in time for 2 remedies mixed together to act
on the same spot), although infinitesimal, is still existent, ergo,
there should be no problem in putting different remedies in the same
bottle, as they cannot act simultaneously, but one after the other.
I have an acute attack of intellectual masturbation, still I think the
question is valid.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".
intellectual offering somewhere from Kent?
Alternation of remedies is only in acute cases, and only in those who are
preparing to see some intellectual M.D. the next day. About the interval,
it varies from patient to patient and no set rules...just as the
alternating of more than one remedies, is not true homoeopathy, so is the
mentioning of this interval. Doing something besides the set principles
does not make room to leave the entire doctrine. Mixing two remedies in one
bottle and giving them independently are two different aspects. Hope you
see the difference when you recover from your masturbating intellect.
Zaidee
Message: 24
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:04:00 +1300
From: "Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD."
Subject: RE: Re: Protocol, Message: 18, Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002
You are saying that there is no problem in giving different remedies in
succession "with an interval", as opposed to mixing them in the same
bottle.
So what is the appropriate interval that will not cause confusion in the
VF, as you say.
12 hours? 8 hours? 1 hour? 5 minutes? 1 minute? 1 second? 1 millisecond?
1 nanosecond?
I am not talking about acute cases where the picture can change rapidly,
so you have to change the remedy.......
If you want to give more than one remedy for a
disease/condition/patient, and I personally do not see anything wrong
with that when it is indicated, how, on what base, do you determine the
interval? And if the interval can be anything, the difference in time
for 2 different "bits" or "quantas" of information to hit the same
target (i.e. the difference in time for 2 remedies mixed together to act
on the same spot), although infinitesimal, is still existent, ergo,
there should be no problem in putting different remedies in the same
bottle, as they cannot act simultaneously, but one after the other.
I have an acute attack of intellectual masturbation, still I think the
question is valid.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".