thanks all for the web site. his articles on the clinical results with PC1 for AIDS
and his the development of the remedy are very interesting and informative
tanya
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Peter Chappell
Re: Peter Chappell
Dear Soroush,
Thanks for the input about Peter. Take care.
Sincerely,
Zaidee
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:51:50 -0000
From: "Finrod"
Subject: Peter Chappell
Dear Zaidee
I have had the honour of being taught by Peter when I was attending London
College of Classical Homoeopathy.
Peter is a Fellow of Society of Homeopaths and has the card number 001 - so
he is a founding father of the society.
Thanks for the input about Peter. Take care.
Sincerely,
Zaidee
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:51:50 -0000
From: "Finrod"
Subject: Peter Chappell
Dear Zaidee
I have had the honour of being taught by Peter when I was attending London
College of Classical Homoeopathy.
Peter is a Fellow of Society of Homeopaths and has the card number 001 - so
he is a founding father of the society.
Re: Peter Chappell
Hope in a day or two, I get his articles, if interested, please let me
know. I haven't read all, but gave a fast gaze, those are about +20...his
article Hahneimann's Use of Potency Over Time is very very informative.
Take care.
Sincerely,
Zaidee
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:48:14 -0500
From: "tanya"
Subject: Re: Peter Chappell
do you happent to have his website? i can no longer find it
tanya
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
know. I haven't read all, but gave a fast gaze, those are about +20...his
article Hahneimann's Use of Potency Over Time is very very informative.
Take care.
Sincerely,
Zaidee
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:48:14 -0500
From: "tanya"
Subject: Re: Peter Chappell
do you happent to have his website? i can no longer find it
tanya
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
Dr. Aamir Shahzad
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 11:00 pm
Re: Peter Chappell
Few months ago, Dr. MAS arranged an inernational seminar,
http://www.pbase.com/aam for which Dr. Peter Chappell sent a video message.
He also sent AIDS remedy. Both are available at WHCC office. Any body, if
interested can send mail at phs@homeopathyhome.net for free video CD and
medicine. So for the medicine has been distributed to 20 doctors who are
experimenting on patients. After compilation of data. The data will be
forwarded to Peter. He is in south africa at the moment. He promised with
dr.MAS that he will come next year in Pakistan.
DR> AAMIR SHAHZAD
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/ca ... p?cid=3963
http://www.pbase.com/aam for which Dr. Peter Chappell sent a video message.
He also sent AIDS remedy. Both are available at WHCC office. Any body, if
interested can send mail at phs@homeopathyhome.net for free video CD and
medicine. So for the medicine has been distributed to 20 doctors who are
experimenting on patients. After compilation of data. The data will be
forwarded to Peter. He is in south africa at the moment. He promised with
dr.MAS that he will come next year in Pakistan.
DR> AAMIR SHAHZAD
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/ca ... p?cid=3963
Re: Peter Chappell
on 2/18/05 5:41 PM, Chris Gillen at chrisgillen@optusnet.com.au wrote:
(((( Benchmark, no. Example, maybe.
Respectfully,
Andy
=======================
"Once upon a time there was a certain raja who called to his servant and
said, 'Come, good fellow, go and gather together in one place all the men of
Savatthi who were born blind... and show them an elephant.' 'Very good,
sire,' replied the servant, and he did as he was told. He said to the blind
men assembled there, 'Here is an elephant,' and to one man he presented the
head of the elephant, to another its ears, to another a tusk, to another the
trunk, the foot, back, tail, and tuft of the tail, saying to each one that
that was the elephant.
"When the blind men had felt the elephant, the raja went to each of them and
said to each, 'Well, blind man, have you seen the elephant? Tell me, what
sort of thing is an elephant?'
"Thereupon the men who were presented with the head answered, 'Sire, an
elephant is like a pot.' And the men who had observed the ear replied, 'An
elephant is like a winnowing basket.' Those who had been presented with a
tusk said it was a ploughshare. Those who knew only the trunk said it was a
plough; others said the body was a grainery; the foot, a pillar; the back, a
mortar; the tail, a pestle, the tuft of the tail, a brush.
"Then they began to quarrel, shouting, 'Yes it is!' 'No, it is not!' 'An
elephant is not that!' 'Yes, it's like that!' and so on, till they came to
blows over the matter.
"Brethren, the raja was delighted with the scene.
"Just so are these preachers and scholars holding various views blind and
unseeing.... In their ignorance they are by nature quarrelsome, wrangling,
and disputatious, each maintaining reality is thus and thus."
(((( Benchmark, no. Example, maybe.
Respectfully,
Andy
=======================
"Once upon a time there was a certain raja who called to his servant and
said, 'Come, good fellow, go and gather together in one place all the men of
Savatthi who were born blind... and show them an elephant.' 'Very good,
sire,' replied the servant, and he did as he was told. He said to the blind
men assembled there, 'Here is an elephant,' and to one man he presented the
head of the elephant, to another its ears, to another a tusk, to another the
trunk, the foot, back, tail, and tuft of the tail, saying to each one that
that was the elephant.
"When the blind men had felt the elephant, the raja went to each of them and
said to each, 'Well, blind man, have you seen the elephant? Tell me, what
sort of thing is an elephant?'
"Thereupon the men who were presented with the head answered, 'Sire, an
elephant is like a pot.' And the men who had observed the ear replied, 'An
elephant is like a winnowing basket.' Those who had been presented with a
tusk said it was a ploughshare. Those who knew only the trunk said it was a
plough; others said the body was a grainery; the foot, a pillar; the back, a
mortar; the tail, a pestle, the tuft of the tail, a brush.
"Then they began to quarrel, shouting, 'Yes it is!' 'No, it is not!' 'An
elephant is not that!' 'Yes, it's like that!' and so on, till they came to
blows over the matter.
"Brethren, the raja was delighted with the scene.
"Just so are these preachers and scholars holding various views blind and
unseeing.... In their ignorance they are by nature quarrelsome, wrangling,
and disputatious, each maintaining reality is thus and thus."
-
Simon King LCPH MARH
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: Peter Chappell
Verily and thrice verily!
Simon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Simon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
Chris_Gillen
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Peter Chappell
AH wrote:
myself
it's
other
Unfortunately it was a substantially poor example if you were hoping to draw
favour to your argument!
Any positive effect derived from the PC1 remedy (in three bottles) is still
an unknown quantity without a proving. And no amount of fancy verbal
footwork has yet to convince that "no proving is necessary with Peter
Chappell's remedy".
Come on now, we all know that there have been some good effects reported and
there have been other reports where no effect was recorded at all in the
designated target disease.
So much for taking all the heavy *individualization* work out of the
equation!!
As homoeopaths, if we are willing to work in this way with no actual proving
material in which we know we are applying the law of similars, or to know
how to rationalize our remedy reactions with known MM, then we may as well
be blindfolded, and playing 'pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey' hoping to hit a
target.
I have a friend who has been diagnosed HIV+ for nearly 20 years. He takes
the allopathic cocktail, he is also a heavy hashish smoker, yet despite the
odd outbreak of herpes and thrush his health remains relatively okay. If I
was to test PC1 on him, I would be no closer to understanding the reason for
his longevity in a homoeopathic sense, because I have nothing to go by
except blind faith in the essence of Peter Chappell's 'god-given healing
ability', divined, manufactured and dropped into a bottle.
God forbid, that the CIA should get its hands on this method of secret
manufacture, we could see Dubya's panacea for the axis of evil in a bottle,
trademarked GD1.
And for the record, I'm all in favour of having PC1 tested, but I won't be
calling it a homoeopathic remedy, any more than I would call a Bach Flower
Remedy homoeopathic, unless a homoeopathic proving can attest to its use by
the law of similars.
Chris.
myself
it's
other
Unfortunately it was a substantially poor example if you were hoping to draw
favour to your argument!
Any positive effect derived from the PC1 remedy (in three bottles) is still
an unknown quantity without a proving. And no amount of fancy verbal
footwork has yet to convince that "no proving is necessary with Peter
Chappell's remedy".
Come on now, we all know that there have been some good effects reported and
there have been other reports where no effect was recorded at all in the
designated target disease.
So much for taking all the heavy *individualization* work out of the
equation!!
As homoeopaths, if we are willing to work in this way with no actual proving
material in which we know we are applying the law of similars, or to know
how to rationalize our remedy reactions with known MM, then we may as well
be blindfolded, and playing 'pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey' hoping to hit a
target.
I have a friend who has been diagnosed HIV+ for nearly 20 years. He takes
the allopathic cocktail, he is also a heavy hashish smoker, yet despite the
odd outbreak of herpes and thrush his health remains relatively okay. If I
was to test PC1 on him, I would be no closer to understanding the reason for
his longevity in a homoeopathic sense, because I have nothing to go by
except blind faith in the essence of Peter Chappell's 'god-given healing
ability', divined, manufactured and dropped into a bottle.
God forbid, that the CIA should get its hands on this method of secret
manufacture, we could see Dubya's panacea for the axis of evil in a bottle,
trademarked GD1.
And for the record, I'm all in favour of having PC1 tested, but I won't be
calling it a homoeopathic remedy, any more than I would call a Bach Flower
Remedy homoeopathic, unless a homoeopathic proving can attest to its use by
the law of similars.
Chris.