Iridiology: useful?

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
Posts: 2279
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Iridiology: useful?

Post by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD »

I just used my fists...and my big mouth...the seminar was taped and will be available through the CHE website soon.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"

www.naturamedica.co.nz


Ellen Madono
Posts: 2012
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: Iridiology: useful?

Post by Ellen Madono »

Great. I will look into it.


Hennie Duits
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: Iridiology: useful?

Post by Hennie Duits »

I’m not sure how the Minutus site works – it seems direct replies (at
least mine) don’t make it to the list, but some (not me) are able to see
my replies. So, I chose to use *this* opportunity to answer. Sorry for
the possible confusion...

In the Netherlands (where I’m from) the first initiatives to set up a
full time education in naturopathy were leaning strongly towards the
German (our next door neighbour) ‘Heilpraktiker’ system.

There used to be something like ‘Das Rezept aus dem Auge’ (hm, looked it
up, it still is – Google Translate may help to get what’s being stated..).
(In *my* opinion, tainted by classical homeopathy, also part of my
education, it is unlikely that a judgement of the iris can directly lead
to a remedy of manufacturers of composite remedies. But I did *not* test
this.)

A few names you might want to Google: Emanuel Felke, Walter Lang, Rudolf
Schnabel, Josef Deck.

I would not be surprised if the iris eventually turns out to be a pretty
true reflection of various basic states of the whole of the human
organism (maybe including ‘miasms’), and maybe even more. But as said, I
doubt if what the iris says could lead to choosing a remedy or treatment.

Hennie

Op 19-3-2019 om 23:23 schreef 'Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD'
homeosensei101@gmail.com [minutus]:
---
Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Ellen Madono
Posts: 2012
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: Iridiology: useful?

Post by Ellen Madono »

I’m being told that the newest research says that the iris does not change color in the major features don’t change because of healing. They are only reflections of the DNA or the miasm and that exists at birth. The coloring can get darker with aging. That is, characteristics of the iris get more intense with aging. But the color will not change from brown to blue, for example. That was the original claim. Listen to a description of constitutions in iridology and they sound very much like what we learn in Homeopathy. After all it comes from the same historical era, so this is not surprising. See Then and Now by Brenda Generali YouTube.
I think the wish that one could choose a remedy through iridology would be pretty hopeless. I’m hoping that iridology might make case management easier. The mucus on the membrane could change, coloring could get less dark, for example. Even a confirmation of the constitutional type would be helpful when you first meet the patient.

You can figure out that from an in depth interview. But, with polarity analysis I don’t have to go into such detail in the beginning. I’d like to lighten up my interview. When possible, going to less depth in the beginning. Then when I get these people who come one time and then quit, I have not wasted all that time. Give something helpful in the beginning but don’t invest so heavily.
Do an iridology reading but again don’t go crazy changing lifestyle. Help a little, and wait for the patient to show commitment.

These iridology people seem to be specialists in nutrition, or herbology and emotional counseling.


Hennie Duits
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: Iridiology: useful?

Post by Hennie Duits »

I’m not sure how the Minutus site works – it seems direct replies (at
least mine) don’t make it to the list, but some (not me) are able to see
my replies. So, I chose to use *this* opportunity to answer. Sorry for
the possible confusion...

In the Netherlands (where I’m from) the first initiatives to set up a
full time education in naturopathy were leaning strongly towards the
German (our next door neighbour) ‘Heilpraktiker’ system.

There used to be something like ‘Das Rezept aus dem Auge’ (hm, looked it
up, it still is – Google Translate may help to get what’s being stated..).
(In *my* opinion, tainted by classical homeopathy, also part of my
education, it is unlikely that a judgement of the iris can directly lead
to a remedy of manufacturers of composite remedies. But I did *not* test
this.)

A few names you might want to Google: Emanuel Felke, Walter Lang, Rudolf
Schnabel, Josef Deck.

I would not be surprised if the iris eventually turns out to be a pretty
true reflection of various basic states of the whole of the human
organism (maybe including ‘miasms’), and maybe even more. But as said, I
doubt if what the iris says could lead to choosing a remedy or treatment.

Hennie
---
Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”