Has anyone any comment on the changes talked about in New Scientist and what it might mean to Homeopathy.
Best Wishes, Jean
The Periodic table
Re: The Periodic table
Hi Jean,
I just read the article. How do you think it might affect Homeopathy?
Atb,
Leilanae
I just read the article. How do you think it might affect Homeopathy?
Atb,
Leilanae
-
Jean Doherty
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: The Periodic table
Do not understand how it differs . Looks a lot more fluid and maybe definitions more fluid.
Was so mind blowing when Scholten first presented his understanding of it and that has worked well.
Thank you, Jean
Was so mind blowing when Scholten first presented his understanding of it and that has worked well.
Thank you, Jean
-
Ellen Madono
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: The Periodic table
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg ... -redesign/
The suggested design makes me think of different ways of thinking about relationships.
The suggested design makes me think of different ways of thinking about relationships.
-
John Benneth
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 8:53 pm
Re: The Periodic table
The relationship between homeopathy and the Periodic Table is a fascinating subject, revealed to us by Copeland the Godfather of modern homeopathy,
From
The Scientific Reasonableness of Homeopathy
by Royal S. Copeland, A.M., M.D.
. . .
". . . If our remedies, in their provings, coincide with the same periodic law, it shows that therapeutically, homeopathy is in harmony with the ever-acting and universal laws of nature. Let us examine and, see. I will not take chlorine, bromine, and iodine, the halogen group, because everybody, familiar at all with materia medica, knows the close relationship existing. Let us take sulphur. selenium, and tellurium. A casual examination of the provings discovers, among other symptoms, the following:
Selenium.
Tellurium.
Sulfur.
And so we might compare phosphorus, arsenic and antimony, and formulate other groups of elements, which, at first thought, seem inappropriate bed fellows.
What, if anything, is the significance of all this? Isn't it a bit remarkable that Hahnemann, a century ago, Metcalf, in 1852, and Berridge, in 1873, working with sulphur, selenium, and tellurium, respectively, should discover the therapeutic value of these drugs, record their results, and then in the year of our Lord, 1909, it should be found that all their provings, forming parts of a cryptogram, are deciphered by means of a chemical formula, and found to coincide with a law of nature? That all of these substances usually considered inert, were proven by the administration of infinitesimal doses, and therapeutically established by repeated clinical tests, gives further proof that homeopathy is true, scientifically exact in every part, and in perfect harmony with the music of the spheres."
Fascinating stuff
More at https://www.homeowatch.org/history/copeland.html
Follow on Twitter @JBennethJournal
Read The John Benneth Journal at johnbenneth.wordpress.com
Call 503–819–7777 or Skype John Benneth, Portland, Oregon USA
From
The Scientific Reasonableness of Homeopathy
by Royal S. Copeland, A.M., M.D.
. . .
". . . If our remedies, in their provings, coincide with the same periodic law, it shows that therapeutically, homeopathy is in harmony with the ever-acting and universal laws of nature. Let us examine and, see. I will not take chlorine, bromine, and iodine, the halogen group, because everybody, familiar at all with materia medica, knows the close relationship existing. Let us take sulphur. selenium, and tellurium. A casual examination of the provings discovers, among other symptoms, the following:
Selenium.
Tellurium.
Sulfur.
And so we might compare phosphorus, arsenic and antimony, and formulate other groups of elements, which, at first thought, seem inappropriate bed fellows.
What, if anything, is the significance of all this? Isn't it a bit remarkable that Hahnemann, a century ago, Metcalf, in 1852, and Berridge, in 1873, working with sulphur, selenium, and tellurium, respectively, should discover the therapeutic value of these drugs, record their results, and then in the year of our Lord, 1909, it should be found that all their provings, forming parts of a cryptogram, are deciphered by means of a chemical formula, and found to coincide with a law of nature? That all of these substances usually considered inert, were proven by the administration of infinitesimal doses, and therapeutically established by repeated clinical tests, gives further proof that homeopathy is true, scientifically exact in every part, and in perfect harmony with the music of the spheres."
Fascinating stuff
More at https://www.homeowatch.org/history/copeland.html
Follow on Twitter @JBennethJournal
Read The John Benneth Journal at johnbenneth.wordpress.com
Call 503–819–7777 or Skype John Benneth, Portland, Oregon USA