Aids - Chronic or Acute

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

Dear Elham

Thank you for making us think.

But I think it is important not to confuse being 'HIV +ve' & AIDs.

People can be HIV +ve for many years and live with few symptoms.

But when the patient has 'full blown' AIDs, their time is short. So we have
an acute picture.

In fact I understand what usually kills AIDs suffers is some kind of lung
problem like pneumonia!

Regards
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[dinis54]

According to Peter Chappell what is to be cured is the Immune-
deficiency state not the diseases resulting from that state.

If you read the complete article of Peter Chappell Web pages you can
verify that he recommends that all that opportunistic diseases
arising from the deficiency must be treated first with conventional
medicine.

So if the patient contracts pneumonia or any other disease they must
be treated first or along with other remedies.

So the PC1 remedy is a remedy for the HIV virus and not for the
diseases derived or allowed by it.

Regards
--- In minutus@y..., "Finrod" wrote:
So we have
of lung

[ramin eslaminasab]

It is better to understand that hiv is a chronic or
acute miasm.
although in chronic miasm viatal force never get rid
of infection these three chronic miasms have same
characteristic pattern that must ba attentiond.
they begins with a skin or mucousal lesions and after
a period of time they have a latent course and then a
secondary outbreak.
does aids have this pattern?
As you know inhepatitis C only 15% will recover of
this miasm but this little percentage can show us that
is an acute miasm.
do we know anyone recover from aids if we can prove
there are somebody recover from aids then it is a
acute miasm.
And aids hasnot the recoginzed pattern of chronic
miasms.
is aids a chronic or acute miasm it is a dilemma.
--- dinis54 wrote:
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2

[Shannon Nelson]

What's "the PC1 remedy"???
Shannon

on 11/11/02 8:10 AM, dinis54 at d_santos@hotmail.com wrote:

[alpha_panthera1]

--- In minutus@y..., "dinis54" wrote:
can
must
But he writes on that same pages that he instructs people to take that
rem. themselves, or to give to patients, according to a simplified
protocol with liquid rem. and succussions, to "spread it to the
people" in need, doesn't he ?. He also wrote that he found it
unpossible to teach (ordinary) people in the rural ethiop. environment
he worked in how to treat homoeopathically, for lack of general formal
education, strangeness of the concept etc., and shortage of time. That
might be nice if those diseases be treated first, but then, is anyone
on the list going to do that job, or anybody else ? The point of his
effort, I understand, is indeed to have a most simple treatment that
works ( relatively well ), knowing that there won't ever be enough
trained healers available for a decade ( or some ) to come. In the
west or elsewhere that may be diferent, wish them all the best, but
reading several posts I got the impression you have no idea how
"health care" in rural sub-sahar. Africa looks like. That is not
"different", it is another world, I assure you. "short-cut" or not,
there's not much of any choice. And if it turns out to be some 50%
gen.ep. or something, and as many survive due to this stuff, and
perhaps 1, 2, 5 % have access to more "refined" treatment elsewhere,
that would make all the difference. I have no idea myself if that will
be successful, just read his sites days before this came up on the
list. Only I felt the perspective needed to be put right.
Regards, Panthera

[elham mohajir]

Dear Friends,

Thank you all for your emails both private and general. I will try to answer all your individual emails in this eon email.

First of all I have no doubt in my mind that AIDS is curable. In fact I have seen three cases cured(not my own patients but a very good classical Homoeopath with whom I used to work fifteen years back). But these were cured by strict individualisation and the medicines were different in each case even though two of them were a married couple.

The question we have to answer before we speak of specifics is how do our medicines work. Let us take a simple scenario ten people are overdosed with mercury come down with symptoms of mercurilisation. In two hundred years we could not find one single medicine that would cure all these ten. Why?

The problem is in one patient the symptoms may be manifested mostly in the mouth where NIt-ac may become the antidote, in another case marked by severe depression Aurum may become the antidote, in a third with joint pains Kali-iod may become the antidote and in a fourth with throat symptoms Phytolacca may be the antidote. Not just that even if in all the patients the symptoms are exactly the same the medicnes will still be different.

This all has to do with susceptibility. Let us try to understand this word. In a room ten people are exposed to a draft of cold ar to a virus. Two of them come down with cold. The others are unaffected. So we say these two were susceptible. It is like a chink in our armour. Homoeopathy cures that chink. Even though the two people were exposed with the same virus their symptoms may be different and they may need different medicines.

Homoeopathic medicines cure this susceptibility. So in reality we are doing nothing to the disease, the disease is just accidental. It might have been another disease from another cause but the patient still needs the same medicine.

That is why we say specially in chronic diseases try to seperate the patient from the disease and then prescribe for the patient. This is where individualisation comes in. You try to look at a patient find his weak point(susceptibility) and then cure that. This you do by studying his signs and symptoms (His not the siseases') forming a picture and then prescribing on that.

Now if you can prove to me that all the AIDS patients in Ethiopia have exactly the same susceptibility then I will agree that they need the same medicine. If a simple non-living metal such as mercury can not have one anti-dote I find it hard -rather impossible-to believe that AIDS will have one specific medicine.

As far as AIDS being an acute disease again I will refer you to hahnemann's definition that Acute diseases are those that left untreated usually end in recovery(and sometimes in death) as AIDS does not fit this definition then it is not acute. It is also not sub-acute as sub-acute diseases either recover or become chronic. As AIDS does not recover by itself it is chronic.

Of course as more and more cases of AIDS are cured we will be better and better able to deal with it. The medicine of Peter will be most welcome addition and will add to some other medicines such as Syph, Acet-ac, tuber, Lach, Carb-v, and Crot-H. that have been reputed to cure this disease.

Best regards
Elham

[dinis54]

PC1 is the name by which the Peter Chappell's secrete remedy to HIV-
AIDS can be identified. You can buy it from Helios Pharmacy in
England.
pharmacy@helios.co.uk
www.helios.co.uk

Regards
--- In minutus@y..., Robert&Shannon Nelson
wrote:
can
conventional
must

[Dave Hartley]

lovely.


Dave Hartley
www.Mr-Notebook.com
www.localcomputermart.com/dave
Seattle, WA 425.820.7443
Asheville, NC 828.285.0240

[Zaidee]

Message: 15
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:53:26 +0530
From: "elham mohajir"
Subject: Re: Re: Aids - Chronic or Acute
Dear Friends,
Thank you all for your emails both private and general. I will try to
answer all your individual emails in this eon email.
First of all I have no doubt in my mind that AIDS is curable. In fact I
have seen three cases cured(not my own patients but a very good classical
Homoeopath with whom I used to work fifteen years back). But these were
cured by strict individualisation and the medicines were different in each
case even though two of them were a married couple.


Of course as more and more cases of AIDS are cured we will be better and
better able to deal with it. The medicine of Peter will be most welcome
addition and will add to some other medicines such as Syph, Acet-ac, tuber,
Lach, Carb-v, and Crot-H. that have been reputed to cure this disease.
Best regards
Elham
------------------------
Sometime back, I read a case in which Puls cured the patient. As far as I
remember, the patient was an old, perverted man. I do not know the exact
word for this, but he was living as a wife with another man. The husband
died and of AIDS, and this so-called wife also suffered from the disease.
He was very sentimental and missed "her" partner. Reportedly, (s)he was
prescribed Puls and said to be cured. To the best of my knowledge, the
potency was not mentioned.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]