CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
SIMPLE ELECTROCHEMICAL EXPLANATION OF HOMEOPATHIC DRUGS
The solute in a homeopathic drug is not molecular because its been ionized, and there are tests that prove it.
All of the extreme controversy over whether or not the homeopathic remedy is placebo or verum, whether or not these materials are medically effective, and all of these phony money offers to “prove homeopathy”, conveniently avoid this simple, demonstrable fact, a fact that separates homeopathy from fiction: the solute in highly diluted solutions used as homeopathic drugs is ionized and can be physically detected by conventional chemical analysis.
Students and professors of electrochemistry should be well aware of this elementary principle of molecular dissociation, that as the solute 0resumably decreases and thins out, its molar conductivity increases to an asymptote and evidence of the solute persists in the solvent despite an apparent infinite number of dilutions.
Why or how the solute persists in infinite dilution is not clear, but strange as it may seem to the zenophobic, it does so, no matter how dilute it is in serial dilutions.
According to Copeland, the solute is not completely deionized until the sixth decimal dilution, at which point the aqueous solvent has completely dissociated the molecular structure of the solute by means of hydrolysis.
There are tests of molar conductance that demonstrate this.
READ MORE AT
https://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2016/ ... d-the-fda/
CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
-
John R. Benneth
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:00 pm
-
Soroush Ebrahimi
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm
Re: CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
Dear John
What would have been useful would have been some test data in your article to show how the experiment was done and then it could be repeated today.
While the proposition may apply to 'minerals' such as Nat-m, Kali-bic or causticum which would ionize with ease in water, please also explain in simple terms how a mixture of organic substances would dissociate into ions. Consider as an example bee or snake poisons.
Rgds
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 16 January 2016 01:02
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
SIMPLE ELECTROCHEMICAL EXPLANATION OF HOMEOPATHIC DRUGS
The solute in a homeopathic drug is not molecular because its been ionized, and there are tests that prove it.
All of the extreme controversy over whether or not the homeopathic remedy is placebo or verum, whether or not these materials are medically effective, and all of these phony money offers to “prove homeopathy”, conveniently avoid this simple, demonstrable fact, a fact that separates homeopathy from fiction: the solute in highly diluted solutions used as homeopathic drugs is ionized and can be physically detected by conventional chemical analysis.
Students and professors of electrochemistry should be well aware of this elementary principle of molecular dissociation, that as the solute 0resumably decreases and thins out, its molar conductivity increases to an asymptote and evidence of the solute persists in the solvent despite an apparent infinite number of dilutions.
Why or how the solute persists in infinite dilution is not clear, but strange as it may seem to the zenophobic, it does so, no matter how dilute it is in serial dilutions.
According to Copeland, the solute is not completely deionized until the sixth decimal dilution, at which point the aqueous solvent has completely dissociated the molecular structure of the solute by means of hydrolysis.
There are tests of molar conductance that demonstrate this.
READ MORE AT
https://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2016/ ... d-the-fda/
What would have been useful would have been some test data in your article to show how the experiment was done and then it could be repeated today.
While the proposition may apply to 'minerals' such as Nat-m, Kali-bic or causticum which would ionize with ease in water, please also explain in simple terms how a mixture of organic substances would dissociate into ions. Consider as an example bee or snake poisons.
Rgds
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 16 January 2016 01:02
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
SIMPLE ELECTROCHEMICAL EXPLANATION OF HOMEOPATHIC DRUGS
The solute in a homeopathic drug is not molecular because its been ionized, and there are tests that prove it.
All of the extreme controversy over whether or not the homeopathic remedy is placebo or verum, whether or not these materials are medically effective, and all of these phony money offers to “prove homeopathy”, conveniently avoid this simple, demonstrable fact, a fact that separates homeopathy from fiction: the solute in highly diluted solutions used as homeopathic drugs is ionized and can be physically detected by conventional chemical analysis.
Students and professors of electrochemistry should be well aware of this elementary principle of molecular dissociation, that as the solute 0resumably decreases and thins out, its molar conductivity increases to an asymptote and evidence of the solute persists in the solvent despite an apparent infinite number of dilutions.
Why or how the solute persists in infinite dilution is not clear, but strange as it may seem to the zenophobic, it does so, no matter how dilute it is in serial dilutions.
According to Copeland, the solute is not completely deionized until the sixth decimal dilution, at which point the aqueous solvent has completely dissociated the molecular structure of the solute by means of hydrolysis.
There are tests of molar conductance that demonstrate this.
READ MORE AT
https://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2016/ ... d-the-fda/
-
John R. Benneth
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:00 pm
Re: CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
In a message dated 1/16/2016 1:01:03 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
Yes, thank you, I agree! I would like to post the dielectric test by Brucato and Stephenson in my next Journal.
Good question, Soroush. But what does happen to these organic molecules? As I am sure you remember, this was a question discussed with Irene. Whereas I have found no conventional explanation in this, I pointed out that complex organic molecules quickly hydrolyze and dissolve into their inorganic components, which then presumably phase into plasma.
Certainly the same tests apply. And certainly all matter registers radiation. Are we willing to conclude these emissions can't be stripped into solvent because they come from an organic source?
I also question the use of the conventional term 'dissociation' in regards to ionization. Could it be that the components 'extrude' rather than separate? Could extrusion explain quantum entanglement? In other words, could it still be the same 'particle', only expanded?
I want to base this discussion on conventional terms and tests first before new ideas are presented, but this brings into question the possibility of a fifth phase, a practically immediate phase that is supra light speed that connects all material phases as enlarged domains projected out from this fifth phase.
Thanks for your discussion Soroush, I always appreciate it very much. I hope you have more to say . .
John
Rgds
Yes, thank you, I agree! I would like to post the dielectric test by Brucato and Stephenson in my next Journal.
Good question, Soroush. But what does happen to these organic molecules? As I am sure you remember, this was a question discussed with Irene. Whereas I have found no conventional explanation in this, I pointed out that complex organic molecules quickly hydrolyze and dissolve into their inorganic components, which then presumably phase into plasma.
Certainly the same tests apply. And certainly all matter registers radiation. Are we willing to conclude these emissions can't be stripped into solvent because they come from an organic source?
I also question the use of the conventional term 'dissociation' in regards to ionization. Could it be that the components 'extrude' rather than separate? Could extrusion explain quantum entanglement? In other words, could it still be the same 'particle', only expanded?
I want to base this discussion on conventional terms and tests first before new ideas are presented, but this brings into question the possibility of a fifth phase, a practically immediate phase that is supra light speed that connects all material phases as enlarged domains projected out from this fifth phase.
Thanks for your discussion Soroush, I always appreciate it very much. I hope you have more to say . .
John
Rgds
-
Soroush Ebrahimi
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm
Re: CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
Dear John
Thank you for reminding us of Irene. May she rest in PEACE.
I look forward to seeing the test result, especially if they have used mixed organic compounds as their subject.
Keep up the good work.
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 16 January 2016 23:52
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
In a message dated 1/16/2016 1:01:03 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
Yes, thank you, I agree! I would like to post the dielectric test by Brucato and Stephenson in my next Journal.
Good question, Soroush. But what does happen to these organic molecules? As I am sure you remember, this was a question discussed with Irene. Whereas I have found no conventional explanation in this, I pointed out that complex organic molecules quickly hydrolyze and dissolve into their inorganic components, which then presumably phase into plasma.
Certainly the same tests apply. And certainly all matter registers radiation. Are we willing to conclude these emissions can't be stripped into solvent because they come from an organic source?
I also question the use of the conventional term 'dissociation' in regards to ionization. Could it be that the components 'extrude' rather than separate? Could extrusion explain quantum entanglement? In other words, could it still be the same 'particle', only expanded?
I want to base this discussion on conventional terms and tests first before new ideas are presented, but this brings into question the possibility of a fifth phase, a practically immediate phase that is supra light speed that connects all material phases as enlarged domains projected out from this fifth phase.
Thanks for your discussion Soroush, I always appreciate it very much. I hope you have more to say . .
John
Rgds
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)
Thank you for reminding us of Irene. May she rest in PEACE.
I look forward to seeing the test result, especially if they have used mixed organic compounds as their subject.
Keep up the good work.
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 16 January 2016 23:52
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY and the FDA
In a message dated 1/16/2016 1:01:03 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
Yes, thank you, I agree! I would like to post the dielectric test by Brucato and Stephenson in my next Journal.
Good question, Soroush. But what does happen to these organic molecules? As I am sure you remember, this was a question discussed with Irene. Whereas I have found no conventional explanation in this, I pointed out that complex organic molecules quickly hydrolyze and dissolve into their inorganic components, which then presumably phase into plasma.
Certainly the same tests apply. And certainly all matter registers radiation. Are we willing to conclude these emissions can't be stripped into solvent because they come from an organic source?
I also question the use of the conventional term 'dissociation' in regards to ionization. Could it be that the components 'extrude' rather than separate? Could extrusion explain quantum entanglement? In other words, could it still be the same 'particle', only expanded?
I want to base this discussion on conventional terms and tests first before new ideas are presented, but this brings into question the possibility of a fifth phase, a practically immediate phase that is supra light speed that connects all material phases as enlarged domains projected out from this fifth phase.
Thanks for your discussion Soroush, I always appreciate it very much. I hope you have more to say . .
John
Rgds
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)