Minutus

Here's a retort. Maybe this is not so interesting? Anyway, I did not think of the retort. Lot to learn.

Hi Chris,
But surely a proving done on only one or two people won't bring out all
of the possibly important expressions of the remedy? (Otherwise,
surely it would be cheaper and easier to just thoroughly train one or
two people for each modern proving, rather than using larger numbers?)
Shannon

Hi, I'm just jumping in here. Hope this is relevant.
A very sensitive person like Netting Sp?? can talk in detail about what he felt during the proving. That sensitive person is going to be very strongly represented. He's sensitive and talks so he gets a greater percent. You are not going to get the insensitive types as a high percent of the proving. I don't think that disqualifies the results from sensitive people. What do you think? You are not going to have a wide range of sensitivity represented. Some of your patients will prove everything you give them. That's their nature.
Blessings,
Ellen

It happens sometimes that only one prover out of a whole group experiences a
particular symptom, but THAT symptom turns out to be THE most characteristic
of the whole remedy, and repeatedly cures all different kinds of people (who
need that remedy).

Chris