psora/animals!
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:10 pm
Hi
I was thinking about this myself. You don't have to be human to suffer from cutaneous infections, parasites etc and i wonder how animals in the wild adjust to mites etc if they are otherwise in good health. Once they are pets those manifestations would be suppressed and you probably have an identifiable psoric miasm being created.
Being old or hungry is maybe what would predispose wild animals to actually getting ill from such infestations rather than just handling it.
Once we are talking about pets i suppose they could pick up on miasmatic energy of their surroundings/owners,and of course pedigree dogs are genetically engineered so to speak. However, I imagine most muts are pretty psoric as that is the miasm that is naturally acquired at that stage of animal/mammal development. As far as i am concerned this is all highly speculative. Maybe someone who knows more about the history of disease in animals could shed light. I am sure suppression is what weakens and imprints the miasms through the generations, i just don't think it is the suppression of one particular disease that was caught by an otherwise healthy person. And in each case i think the named diseases is probably just primus inter pares of diseases that a type of susceptibility would have led to.
Theresa
Theresa-
Aren't you asking the difficult questions? What came first -
weakening of vital force due to something and then suppression of the
resultant problems or suppression leading to weakening of vital
force? Egg or Chicken or Egg AND Chicken?
Related to these eggs and chickens:
Another related question - esp. for the homeopath vets we have-
Are animals miasmatically afflicted and if yes - what miasms are
these? Syphilitic? Gonorrheal?
Are there specific miasms for different animal species? How are these
approached and treated? Is miasm theory applicable only to humans?
What about the chronic diseases in animals? Is there a homeopathic
rationale for chronic infections in animals and degenerative diseases
in them.
I would have thought dogs are very psoric- the fleas and itches that
they have and these could be suppressed very easily... any remedy NOT
homeopathic should lead to suppression - dog itches and then bites
the itchy spot and given that in olden day dogs generally did not
brush their teeth it is highly likely that their saliva and food
particles that apply on the itch could act as an UNHOMEOPATHIC
application and lead to suppression and voila - what have you - a
Psoric Doggy-
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Theresa Partington"
wrote:
some susceptibility/disease, allopath or homeopath.
diseases was responsible for the creation of the miasms or whether
the predisposition was there and still is, perhaps because
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I was thinking about this myself. You don't have to be human to suffer from cutaneous infections, parasites etc and i wonder how animals in the wild adjust to mites etc if they are otherwise in good health. Once they are pets those manifestations would be suppressed and you probably have an identifiable psoric miasm being created.
Being old or hungry is maybe what would predispose wild animals to actually getting ill from such infestations rather than just handling it.
Once we are talking about pets i suppose they could pick up on miasmatic energy of their surroundings/owners,and of course pedigree dogs are genetically engineered so to speak. However, I imagine most muts are pretty psoric as that is the miasm that is naturally acquired at that stage of animal/mammal development. As far as i am concerned this is all highly speculative. Maybe someone who knows more about the history of disease in animals could shed light. I am sure suppression is what weakens and imprints the miasms through the generations, i just don't think it is the suppression of one particular disease that was caught by an otherwise healthy person. And in each case i think the named diseases is probably just primus inter pares of diseases that a type of susceptibility would have led to.
Theresa
Theresa-
Aren't you asking the difficult questions? What came first -
weakening of vital force due to something and then suppression of the
resultant problems or suppression leading to weakening of vital
force? Egg or Chicken or Egg AND Chicken?
Related to these eggs and chickens:
Another related question - esp. for the homeopath vets we have-
Are animals miasmatically afflicted and if yes - what miasms are
these? Syphilitic? Gonorrheal?
Are there specific miasms for different animal species? How are these
approached and treated? Is miasm theory applicable only to humans?
What about the chronic diseases in animals? Is there a homeopathic
rationale for chronic infections in animals and degenerative diseases
in them.
I would have thought dogs are very psoric- the fleas and itches that
they have and these could be suppressed very easily... any remedy NOT
homeopathic should lead to suppression - dog itches and then bites
the itchy spot and given that in olden day dogs generally did not
brush their teeth it is highly likely that their saliva and food
particles that apply on the itch could act as an UNHOMEOPATHIC
application and lead to suppression and voila - what have you - a
Psoric Doggy-
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Theresa Partington"
wrote:
some susceptibility/disease, allopath or homeopath.
diseases was responsible for the creation of the miasms or whether
the predisposition was there and still is, perhaps because
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]