Minutus

Hi Sheri, thanks for your reply.
YEs I agree with you. Though I haven't had the problem of changing a
remedy (in C potency) that's working well, because the signs of a
good response (not just the 'feel good' factor) are always present to
indicate the similimum, if one looks hard enough. I think that comes
with a bit of expereince.

HAving more experience with C's (18 years), I tend to start with
them.
BUT from David I learnt the usefulness of LM's and have slowly
develeoped a clearer comparitive idea of using one vs the other.
Especially in cases like this child, and weaning off Psyciatric
drugs. David always prefers LM's in such situations becasue they are
easy to repeat, as well as adjust the strength of doses.

So I think, yes there is a place for each of them and its up to each
practitioner to get acqainted with both scales, including water and
dry dose responses. One is faced with all types of circumstances and
individual cases that require I think, a versitality in approach
through experience.

Leela
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Sheri Nakken
wrote:

30C, 200C,
We
hours
a
with
anyway.
you
Chronic
reliable