Actions of remedies
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 8:40 pm
Hello,
It is truly interesting that Hering thought Hahnemann was wrong about the effects of remedies. Please read this article:
HERING'S WRITINGS ABOUT PRIMARY, SECONDARY, ALTERNATING EFFECTS
http://www.curantur.de/English/Articles ... fects.html
Also M.L.Sehgal, founder of Revolutionized Homeopathy, describes the primary and secondary actions of a remedy totally differently. In his method, the primary action is relief and the secondary action is aggravation. These actions have some laws that I will not include here.
http://www.ssrhindia.com
What is your opinion? Have you had any experiences supporting Hering's or Sehgal's observations? Do you think Hahnemann was wrong somewhere? Why? How?
Sincerely,
Feras Hakkak
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
It is truly interesting that Hering thought Hahnemann was wrong about the effects of remedies. Please read this article:
HERING'S WRITINGS ABOUT PRIMARY, SECONDARY, ALTERNATING EFFECTS
http://www.curantur.de/English/Articles ... fects.html
Also M.L.Sehgal, founder of Revolutionized Homeopathy, describes the primary and secondary actions of a remedy totally differently. In his method, the primary action is relief and the secondary action is aggravation. These actions have some laws that I will not include here.
http://www.ssrhindia.com
What is your opinion? Have you had any experiences supporting Hering's or Sehgal's observations? Do you think Hahnemann was wrong somewhere? Why? How?
Sincerely,
Feras Hakkak
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]