3 remedies in a gap of 24 hours
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2005 5:50 pm
Dear Soroush, you have criticised this method before of prescribing 30c,
then 200c, then 1m of a rx within 24 hours, and to be honest I have to agree
with you. But you are happily prescribing the mysterious PC rx and you don't
even know what's in them - could be multiple nosodes for all you know and do
you know what the potencies are - maybe even multiple potencies.
Seems very contradictory practice to me.
Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Finrod" wrote:
Dear Rochelle
I know that some colleges teach this way - I have not managed to find any
reference for it any where - hence asking for it.
Masters like Hn and Kent etc INSTRUCT that the action of a remedy should be
evaluated before it may be repeated. Hence my problem with this technique.
Does it come from George Vithoulkas?
Rgds
Soroush
then 200c, then 1m of a rx within 24 hours, and to be honest I have to agree
with you. But you are happily prescribing the mysterious PC rx and you don't
even know what's in them - could be multiple nosodes for all you know and do
you know what the potencies are - maybe even multiple potencies.
Seems very contradictory practice to me.
Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Finrod" wrote:
Dear Rochelle
I know that some colleges teach this way - I have not managed to find any
reference for it any where - hence asking for it.
Masters like Hn and Kent etc INSTRUCT that the action of a remedy should be
evaluated before it may be repeated. Hence my problem with this technique.
Does it come from George Vithoulkas?
Rgds
Soroush