Susceptibility/miasmatic influence
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:29 pm
This is a huge leap of assumption on your part Soroush and of what real use
is it?
Also how can you have a society which has both Law of the Jungle - kill or
be killed - and humans who are living in harmony and disease free (on day
one). It seems to me that this would already be a world tainted by the
chronic miasms. From the dawn of civilisation (ironically so called) and
when some humans had the control of fire you already had power of one group
over another. We don't seem to have looked back since.
I still opt for the synchronous and parallel development of susceptibility
and miasmatic influence as I said in a previous post.
And it is "humankind', not mankind
Joy (who has finished on this now)
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
From: finrod@webstar.co.uk
Subject: [Minutus] susceptibility / miasmatic influence
Date: 13 March 2005 12:27:42 GMT
Dear Joy
Let us assume that this is day 1 of mankind on Earth. He is clean in all
matters and knows what to do. He is free from miasms and disease.
Let us assume he is in harmony with himself and the environment.
This means that he has micro organisms inside him in some kind of a balance
and also outside of him.
But it does not mean that he is not susceptible. We are susceptible to a
number of things and if one thing weakens us, it leads to other factors
taking advantage.
But let us understand that it is a situation where the Law of Jungle
applies. So it is kill or be killed and also the strong will dominate the
weak.
Ignoring all the issues about deviations from the straight and narrow etc, I
am theorising now, but all we need is for the environmental conditions to
change rapidly for our character to become stressed. Lack of food would soon
follow - stresses would soon build up and weaken and our chaps may become
infected by one of the germs with which he was in harmony. This is what Hn
called acute miasm.
Let us assume that he survives, but the battle scars remain. These are the
chronic effects.
These are then passed on to the next generation and we therefore have the
inherited chronic effects of an epidemic disease. What the Master called
chronic miasm.
Good homoeopathy will reduce our susceptibility - that is really the only
sensible conclusion I can make.
But at the end of the day, no end of such discussion is going to get us
anywhere - we need to learn to heal our patients.
Rgds
Soroush
is it?
Also how can you have a society which has both Law of the Jungle - kill or
be killed - and humans who are living in harmony and disease free (on day
one). It seems to me that this would already be a world tainted by the
chronic miasms. From the dawn of civilisation (ironically so called) and
when some humans had the control of fire you already had power of one group
over another. We don't seem to have looked back since.
I still opt for the synchronous and parallel development of susceptibility
and miasmatic influence as I said in a previous post.
And it is "humankind', not mankind
Joy (who has finished on this now)
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
From: finrod@webstar.co.uk
Subject: [Minutus] susceptibility / miasmatic influence
Date: 13 March 2005 12:27:42 GMT
Dear Joy
Let us assume that this is day 1 of mankind on Earth. He is clean in all
matters and knows what to do. He is free from miasms and disease.
Let us assume he is in harmony with himself and the environment.
This means that he has micro organisms inside him in some kind of a balance
and also outside of him.
But it does not mean that he is not susceptible. We are susceptible to a
number of things and if one thing weakens us, it leads to other factors
taking advantage.
But let us understand that it is a situation where the Law of Jungle
applies. So it is kill or be killed and also the strong will dominate the
weak.
Ignoring all the issues about deviations from the straight and narrow etc, I
am theorising now, but all we need is for the environmental conditions to
change rapidly for our character to become stressed. Lack of food would soon
follow - stresses would soon build up and weaken and our chaps may become
infected by one of the germs with which he was in harmony. This is what Hn
called acute miasm.
Let us assume that he survives, but the battle scars remain. These are the
chronic effects.
These are then passed on to the next generation and we therefore have the
inherited chronic effects of an epidemic disease. What the Master called
chronic miasm.
Good homoeopathy will reduce our susceptibility - that is really the only
sensible conclusion I can make.
But at the end of the day, no end of such discussion is going to get us
anywhere - we need to learn to heal our patients.
Rgds
Soroush