Page 1 of 1

re nanufacture of PC2

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 3:37 pm
by Theresa Partington
Hi Peter, Andy, Sorush,

definitions of genus epidemicus apart, many people will have trouble
understanding the actual manufacture of the remedy as outlined below:

****Translating this into a mathematical formulation using a branch of
abstract mathematics similar to fractal mathematics. (That allows love as an
ingredient). This is higher mathematics.
Transforming the mathematical formula into an electronic signal, like a
Fourier Transform, standard technology.
Putting the electronic signal through a coil around a ferrite C shaped core
so that it becomes a magnetic field, standard technology. ******
The 2nd and 3rd stage sound feasible, especially if we accept remedy making
machines and acknowledge that we don't fully understand how traditional
manufacture of remedies works. The first part though needs a bit of further
explanation. How do fractals help in translating what is essentially a
descriptive list of symptoms into mathematical formulae? What is meant by
*similar* to fractal maths, and of course how can an emotion,love, be
integrated at this stage? The exact formulae need not be put in the public
domain at this stage, but the feasibility of the process could perhaps be
explained a bit more.

BW

Theresa
-----

Re: re nanufacture of PC2

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 7:48 pm
by peter chappell
well TP, the difficulty i have with this is that, as i know it, you have a personal grudge against me so i dont think you are really trying to be objective but seeking to shoot me down.
bye
peter

Theresa Partington wrote:

Hi Peter, Andy, Sorush,

definitions of genus epidemicus apart, many people will have trouble
understanding the actual manufacture of the remedy as outlined below:

****Translating this into a mathematical formulation using a branch of
abstract mathematics similar to fractal mathematics. (That allows love as an
ingredient). This is higher mathematics.
Transforming the mathematical formula into an electronic signal, like a
Fourier Transform, standard technology.
Putting the electronic signal through a coil around a ferrite C shaped core
so that it becomes a magnetic field, standard technology. ******
The 2nd and 3rd stage sound feasible, especially if we accept remedy making
machines and acknowledge that we don't fully understand how traditional
manufacture of remedies works. The first part though needs a bit of further
explanation. How do fractals help in translating what is essentially a
descriptive list of symptoms into mathematical formulae? What is meant by
*similar* to fractal maths, and of course how can an emotion,love, be
integrated at this stage? The exact formulae need not be put in the public
domain at this stage, but the feasibility of the process could perhaps be
explained a bit more.

BW

Theresa
-----
Clinical Guidance for Homeopaths and Students of Homeopathy!
http://www.shahrdarhost.net/Clinical%20Guidance.htm
ATTENTION PLEASE:

The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.

****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!

If you do not wish to receive individual emails, send a message with the subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: re nanufacture of PC2

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:09 am
by Julian Winston
>well TP, the difficulty i have with this is that, as i know it, you

Oh my!! Personal grudge? So, "I don't have to reply because you hate
me anyway"?
I thought Theresa's questions were valuable and fobbing them off as
part of a "personal grudge" does nothing to answer the OTHERS on this
list who have no animosity toward you but certainly DO have the same
questions!
EXPLAIN "Standard technology." Saying "This is higher mathematics"
is a non-sequitor. Have you run this by someone who is involved in
"higher mathematics"?
Absolutely. How would you use this process to make a remedy for the
common cold. Be specific.

JW