Miasms and Homicide (Willy)
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 6:21 am
Hi Willy,
Again, we still have a very stretched idea of what the word "miasm"
meant as far as Hahnemann was concerned.
Miasm is an "obnoxious disease producing agent which is inimical to
life".
There are organisms that produce a Psoric miasmatic expression, there
are organisms that produces a Tubercular disease expression, there
are organisms that produce a sycotic disease expression and there are
organisms that produce a syphillitic disease expression.
Why these differences in disease expression is not only based on the
individual expresion, but is also based on the properties of
the "obnoxious disease producing agent".
Scabies, Mycobaterium Tuberculosis, NEisseria Gonorrhea, Teponema
Pallidum (Syphillis) are all organisms that produce the specific
miasmatic expression right down to the development of various
pathology and the reason why (as in maintaining causes, state of
mind, habits, morals, diet) one ends up with any of these chronic
disease in the first place. Hence these expressions were given names
based on this disease.
There were also very specific disease expressions that developed when
these disease were not treated properly or suppressed.
With Cancer, we don't see this type of development. Cancers can be of
vaious types and cover every single miasm depending on what is its
expression. So there is a precursor miasmatic expression that
produces a disease state of cancer and is expressed in pathology and
disease progression of that miasmatic taint. Because Carcinosin is
used as a nosode commonly, does not justify that Cancer is a miasm in
the original sense of the word.
IT does mean though, that the Cancer expression has become very
common and there are various reasons to that. There has also been
identified a cancer state of mind exemplified by the carcinosin mind
picture as well as the pathological understanding of what a
malignancy means. It doesnot take you very far from its origins in
multimiasmatic predisposition.
When one goes down to nuts and nolts, there will be a predominant
misamatic expression in the pahtology that will point to some
predominant miasms (psoric, tubercular, sycotic, syphillitic) besides
various suppressive treatment in the past history and family history -
and careful questioning will show that.
Looking for this pattern is a way of thinking that develops when one
has studied what Hahnemann meant to convey in the Chronic Diseases
where he classified ALL disease expression and subsequent development
prevalent in those days, into these 3 and later 4 groups.
So if we need to extrapolate on that - its best to clearly express
the etrapolation (using a diferent and less confusing terminology)
as well as how will it be helpful in clincial cure to do so.
Is this what you wanted to ask?
dr. leela
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Willy" wrote:
the mail)
founded in the
amongst humans
the
producing
miasm? If
to ask
and what
then, over
cancers have
cancer
acedemic than
Again, we still have a very stretched idea of what the word "miasm"
meant as far as Hahnemann was concerned.
Miasm is an "obnoxious disease producing agent which is inimical to
life".
There are organisms that produce a Psoric miasmatic expression, there
are organisms that produces a Tubercular disease expression, there
are organisms that produce a sycotic disease expression and there are
organisms that produce a syphillitic disease expression.
Why these differences in disease expression is not only based on the
individual expresion, but is also based on the properties of
the "obnoxious disease producing agent".
Scabies, Mycobaterium Tuberculosis, NEisseria Gonorrhea, Teponema
Pallidum (Syphillis) are all organisms that produce the specific
miasmatic expression right down to the development of various
pathology and the reason why (as in maintaining causes, state of
mind, habits, morals, diet) one ends up with any of these chronic
disease in the first place. Hence these expressions were given names
based on this disease.
There were also very specific disease expressions that developed when
these disease were not treated properly or suppressed.
With Cancer, we don't see this type of development. Cancers can be of
vaious types and cover every single miasm depending on what is its
expression. So there is a precursor miasmatic expression that
produces a disease state of cancer and is expressed in pathology and
disease progression of that miasmatic taint. Because Carcinosin is
used as a nosode commonly, does not justify that Cancer is a miasm in
the original sense of the word.
IT does mean though, that the Cancer expression has become very
common and there are various reasons to that. There has also been
identified a cancer state of mind exemplified by the carcinosin mind
picture as well as the pathological understanding of what a
malignancy means. It doesnot take you very far from its origins in
multimiasmatic predisposition.
When one goes down to nuts and nolts, there will be a predominant
misamatic expression in the pahtology that will point to some
predominant miasms (psoric, tubercular, sycotic, syphillitic) besides
various suppressive treatment in the past history and family history -
and careful questioning will show that.
Looking for this pattern is a way of thinking that develops when one
has studied what Hahnemann meant to convey in the Chronic Diseases
where he classified ALL disease expression and subsequent development
prevalent in those days, into these 3 and later 4 groups.
So if we need to extrapolate on that - its best to clearly express
the etrapolation (using a diferent and less confusing terminology)
as well as how will it be helpful in clincial cure to do so.
Is this what you wanted to ask?
dr. leela
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Willy" wrote:
the mail)
founded in the
amongst humans
the
producing
miasm? If
to ask
and what
then, over
cancers have
cancer
acedemic than