AIDS NOSODE
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 6:18 am
))) Dear Shannon, This is an interesting question. Maybe Didi in
Kenya has comments on this from her clinic. From reading the material
from Simon, it appears that this rx is destined to become a
"polychrest", and that more will become known over its further use.
Comments: I would say that the "instant gratification" aspect did not
"give rise" to any AIDS cases, but appears to be one of the
characteristics of the outward expression of the susceptibility of the
miasm. "Instant gratification" is not causal, but only indicative, if
there are other "legs of the stool" which resolve the picture towards
the AIDS miasm. And, as in any miasm in any given case, not all the
known attributes will be evident, although confirmatory probing might
find them if they are not apparent from the person narrating their
complaints.
To use this as a platform for a couple of more of my own exercises in
understanding the remedies we use and how to match them to
clients------- two items to suggest beyond "doctrine of signatures"
style of analysis of these VERY USEFUL compilations that Simon is very
kindly providing.
MIASM IS AN ECHO OF THE NOSOLOGICALLY DEFINED EXPRESSED DISEASE AND
GOES BEYOND IT
--the expression of a given miasm is not equivalent to the disease
which was the opportunist of the original susceptibility from which the
disease, and then the miasm, arose. Example: Syphilitic miasm is not
equivalent to syphilis, but is a "ghost" of it, with far reaching
implications in the organism by means of having been present through
gestation and then through life. A miasm is a derangement of the
nonphysical energies which then interfere with a pattern of processes
on the physical level through genetic transcription deficiencies and
errors; and resulting psychophysical tendencies. That the monkey
wrench was present through gestation itself and irrevocable stages of
development cause it to bring forth aspects not present in the adult
obtaining the infection sexually while not being particularly
syphilitic as a constitution--and not having specifically received the
taint. Using the nosode syphilinum could very well be absolutely
necessary in a case of the syphilitic miasm, and pivotal in cure,
making the original infective element clear by empirical means. But
the remedy is a similar, and not an "equal".
The miasm in part begets the infection, and is inseparable from it
(though the infection through its virulence could occur even if the
susceptibility is not particarly high). The original infection came
about through the nature of universal nonphysical structure---then the
propagation of the resulting infection to offspring begat what we call
the miasm. The expressed disease (by clinical definition) itself and
its stages are echoed in the effects of the taint on the organism. But
their expression is not one and the same. The miasm is an echo of the
original disease as expressed in the bodies of the human who gestated
from the combination of the two tainted gametic cells of the parents.
The "disease" is limited to one body and is florid. The miasm is
inherited, is inherent and hidden in the whole expression of the
morphology and personality of the person. The miasm has themes of the
disease, but it is more far-reaching.
Thus, it may not be surprising to see expressions from the miasm that
are not present in the clinical nosology of the disease apprehended by
the non-embryo person already outside the womb. Or, more likely,
these characteristics in fact ARE there, but aren't given to any system
of medicine except one like homeopathy which goes into such depth in
understanding beyond just the clinical reports of standard medicine.
From what Simon says
so far, it appears that the theme of
"BOUNDARY/immune and operational INCOMPETENCY" leading to OVERWHELM and
LOSS of will, energy and DESIRE TO INTERACT WITH OTHERS and be
conscientious and disciplined--- could be a central theme. With
energy sapped, things DON'T MANIFEST NEARLY AS FAST AS NEEDED, leading
to impetuousness and impatience (cf Medorrhinum). Opportunistic
infections which are minor in others but become significant and chronic
lower the quality of life, leading to loss of luster in anything.
This leads to dropping of RESPONSIBILITY. There is a tendency to BLAME
others and events outside of oneself for one's plight. WEAKNESS and
emaciation are always present.
Any comments on those broad themes and suggestions on embellishment or
other attempts at getting the central idea and or minimum syndrome of
maximum value?
A related issue (kind of stating the obvious, but will do it for sake
of completeness) --this is on the theme of being able to predict a
miasm from the extant "disease":
REMEDY SYMPTOMS CANNOT ALL BE PREDICTED A PRIORI
--we can never predict all the symptoms of a remedy only by analyzing
the substance from which it is made. There are almost always
surprises. These are found through systematic provings on people who
mostly do NOT need the remedy (and compiling the NEW symptoms which are
provoked in those people);
OR clinically (by using the rx on people who apparently DO need the
remedy and compiling the symptoms which the client HAS before receiving
the rx--- which disappear when the case clearly goes through a cycle of
"cure"). To state the obvious example--nat-m===is it possible to guess
the bashful urination symptom from the substance sodium chloride?
Maybe somehow in retrospect. But not *a priori*.
That being said, the use of signatures of any kind, and derived unified
theories (eg J. Scholten's brilliant elucidation of the alchemical
periodic chart) are essential to homeopathy. We use not only
"symptoms" per se, but also "themes", and ANY CONFIRMED clues we can
get. Miasmatic clues are extremely helpful. For example, Rajan
Sankaran's method REQUIRES the precision miasm be present to justify
most prescriptions that are based on his TAXONOMY--VITAL
SENSATION/GESTURE/THEME---MIASM "triangulation" method. This method
extends the materia medica beyond the known symptoms of remedies and
allows use of unproved remedies, thus allowing clinical "reverse
provings" to extend our knowledge when no *a priori* provings may ever
be forthcoming--at least soon.
I am grateful for this exposition on the AIDS miasm, and hope we get
more of the more recent info. The info from the disease, the proving,
and especially from the clinical experience and thematic and anchoring
symptoms thus derived seems relatively mature at this point, thanks to
our colleagues in the UK.
AIDS, perhaps even regardless of the source of the infective agent,
erupted floridly in the human genome and is a miasm which probably has
been here all along as a taint in the universal structure---and
unfolded and was identified at a particular time. It is not yet part
of Dr. Sankaran's system of miasms. His system is a supremely
important leap in the proper direction and possibly worthy of the
homeopathic Nobel Prize. However IMO which is far from complete as
regards miasms, as Rajan himself also says.
The AIDS nosode seems likely to solve a lot of unsolved cases.
Thanks Simon, Shannon of the Dells, and to all.
Best to all,
Andy
Kenya has comments on this from her clinic. From reading the material
from Simon, it appears that this rx is destined to become a
"polychrest", and that more will become known over its further use.
Comments: I would say that the "instant gratification" aspect did not
"give rise" to any AIDS cases, but appears to be one of the
characteristics of the outward expression of the susceptibility of the
miasm. "Instant gratification" is not causal, but only indicative, if
there are other "legs of the stool" which resolve the picture towards
the AIDS miasm. And, as in any miasm in any given case, not all the
known attributes will be evident, although confirmatory probing might
find them if they are not apparent from the person narrating their
complaints.
To use this as a platform for a couple of more of my own exercises in
understanding the remedies we use and how to match them to
clients------- two items to suggest beyond "doctrine of signatures"
style of analysis of these VERY USEFUL compilations that Simon is very
kindly providing.
MIASM IS AN ECHO OF THE NOSOLOGICALLY DEFINED EXPRESSED DISEASE AND
GOES BEYOND IT
--the expression of a given miasm is not equivalent to the disease
which was the opportunist of the original susceptibility from which the
disease, and then the miasm, arose. Example: Syphilitic miasm is not
equivalent to syphilis, but is a "ghost" of it, with far reaching
implications in the organism by means of having been present through
gestation and then through life. A miasm is a derangement of the
nonphysical energies which then interfere with a pattern of processes
on the physical level through genetic transcription deficiencies and
errors; and resulting psychophysical tendencies. That the monkey
wrench was present through gestation itself and irrevocable stages of
development cause it to bring forth aspects not present in the adult
obtaining the infection sexually while not being particularly
syphilitic as a constitution--and not having specifically received the
taint. Using the nosode syphilinum could very well be absolutely
necessary in a case of the syphilitic miasm, and pivotal in cure,
making the original infective element clear by empirical means. But
the remedy is a similar, and not an "equal".
The miasm in part begets the infection, and is inseparable from it
(though the infection through its virulence could occur even if the
susceptibility is not particarly high). The original infection came
about through the nature of universal nonphysical structure---then the
propagation of the resulting infection to offspring begat what we call
the miasm. The expressed disease (by clinical definition) itself and
its stages are echoed in the effects of the taint on the organism. But
their expression is not one and the same. The miasm is an echo of the
original disease as expressed in the bodies of the human who gestated
from the combination of the two tainted gametic cells of the parents.
The "disease" is limited to one body and is florid. The miasm is
inherited, is inherent and hidden in the whole expression of the
morphology and personality of the person. The miasm has themes of the
disease, but it is more far-reaching.
Thus, it may not be surprising to see expressions from the miasm that
are not present in the clinical nosology of the disease apprehended by
the non-embryo person already outside the womb. Or, more likely,
these characteristics in fact ARE there, but aren't given to any system
of medicine except one like homeopathy which goes into such depth in
understanding beyond just the clinical reports of standard medicine.
From what Simon says
so far, it appears that the theme of "BOUNDARY/immune and operational INCOMPETENCY" leading to OVERWHELM and
LOSS of will, energy and DESIRE TO INTERACT WITH OTHERS and be
conscientious and disciplined--- could be a central theme. With
energy sapped, things DON'T MANIFEST NEARLY AS FAST AS NEEDED, leading
to impetuousness and impatience (cf Medorrhinum). Opportunistic
infections which are minor in others but become significant and chronic
lower the quality of life, leading to loss of luster in anything.
This leads to dropping of RESPONSIBILITY. There is a tendency to BLAME
others and events outside of oneself for one's plight. WEAKNESS and
emaciation are always present.
Any comments on those broad themes and suggestions on embellishment or
other attempts at getting the central idea and or minimum syndrome of
maximum value?
A related issue (kind of stating the obvious, but will do it for sake
of completeness) --this is on the theme of being able to predict a
miasm from the extant "disease":
REMEDY SYMPTOMS CANNOT ALL BE PREDICTED A PRIORI
--we can never predict all the symptoms of a remedy only by analyzing
the substance from which it is made. There are almost always
surprises. These are found through systematic provings on people who
mostly do NOT need the remedy (and compiling the NEW symptoms which are
provoked in those people);
OR clinically (by using the rx on people who apparently DO need the
remedy and compiling the symptoms which the client HAS before receiving
the rx--- which disappear when the case clearly goes through a cycle of
"cure"). To state the obvious example--nat-m===is it possible to guess
the bashful urination symptom from the substance sodium chloride?
Maybe somehow in retrospect. But not *a priori*.
That being said, the use of signatures of any kind, and derived unified
theories (eg J. Scholten's brilliant elucidation of the alchemical
periodic chart) are essential to homeopathy. We use not only
"symptoms" per se, but also "themes", and ANY CONFIRMED clues we can
get. Miasmatic clues are extremely helpful. For example, Rajan
Sankaran's method REQUIRES the precision miasm be present to justify
most prescriptions that are based on his TAXONOMY--VITAL
SENSATION/GESTURE/THEME---MIASM "triangulation" method. This method
extends the materia medica beyond the known symptoms of remedies and
allows use of unproved remedies, thus allowing clinical "reverse
provings" to extend our knowledge when no *a priori* provings may ever
be forthcoming--at least soon.
I am grateful for this exposition on the AIDS miasm, and hope we get
more of the more recent info. The info from the disease, the proving,
and especially from the clinical experience and thematic and anchoring
symptoms thus derived seems relatively mature at this point, thanks to
our colleagues in the UK.
AIDS, perhaps even regardless of the source of the infective agent,
erupted floridly in the human genome and is a miasm which probably has
been here all along as a taint in the universal structure---and
unfolded and was identified at a particular time. It is not yet part
of Dr. Sankaran's system of miasms. His system is a supremely
important leap in the proper direction and possibly worthy of the
homeopathic Nobel Prize. However IMO which is far from complete as
regards miasms, as Rajan himself also says.
The AIDS nosode seems likely to solve a lot of unsolved cases.
Thanks Simon, Shannon of the Dells, and to all.
Best to all,
Andy