Triads I
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 7:21 am
Here is information I have collected based of previous discussions on this
subject:
Kent's Triads
Sulphur, Calc Carb, Lycopodium, Skin (Anti-psoric).
Sulphur, Merc Sol, Thuja, Anti-Miasmatic.
Carbo Veg, China, Lycopodium, Flatulence.
Arsenicum alb, Phos, Sulphur, Burning Sensation.
Aconite, Ars Alb, Rhus tox, Restlessness.
Aconite, Chamomilla, Coffea, Pain Sensitivity.
Belladonna, Hyoscyamus, Stramonium, Delirium.
Lachesis, Naja, Crotalus, Snake Remedy Trio.
Kali iod, Sanguinaria, Stannum. Cough after pneumonia.
Aconite, Ignatia, Opium, Fear.
Ant tart, Opium, Nux Mosch, Drowsiness.
Ipecac, Cuprum Met. Veratrum Alb, Collapse in cholera.
Ignatia, Nat Mur, Acid Phos, Grief.
Causticum, Rhus tox, Sulphur, Rheumatism.
Belladonna, Calc Carb, Nat Mur, Upper Lips.
Glonine, Belladonna, Mellilotus, Headaches.
Gelsemium, Causticum, Sepia, Droopy Eyelids.
And from Boenninghausen, one not in Nash's List :
Aconite, Spongia, Hepar sulph, The Croup Powders.
Remember these in order: ASH. That is how they will be needed!
----------------
from Will Taylor discussion:
Kent speaks of viewing the series of remedies sometimes necessary in
bringing about cure as a process of gradual unfolding, without
hypothesizing a hierarchical relationship between the successive
prescriptions. From his lecture on the Second Prescription," What is more
beautiful to look upon than the bud during its hourly changes to the rose
in its bloom. This evolution has so often come to my mind when patiently
awaiting the return of symptoms after the first prescription has exhausted
its curative power. The return symptom image unfolds the knowledge by which
we know whether the first prescription was the specific or the palliative,
i.e., we may know whether the remedy was deep enough to cure all the
deranged vital wrong or simply a
superficially acting remedy, capable of only a temporary effect. The many
things learned by
the action of the first remedy determine the kind of demand made upon the
physician for the
second prescription."
Boenninghausen, in his Concordances, brings to this question his incredible
wealth of clinical
experience and knowledge of the materia medica. These are the most
exhaustive listings of
relationships between remedies that have been produced. Rather than
producing a theoretical scheme for division of the economy of the organism
into "layers", Boenninghausen has provided us with an essentially pragmatic
list of "what is likely to follow what". We find scattered in our
literature references to remedy relationships, e.g., the often cited "Calc
Lyc Sulph" series, references to complementary pairs of remedies such as
Bell/Calc c, Rhus t/Calc p, Puls/Sil, Acon/Sulph, Ign/Nat m, Apis/Nat m,
etc.; and Gibson Miller has given us the list of remedy relations found in
the back of current editions of Kent's Repertory; but we find nowhere as
extensive a listing of these relationships of remedies as Boenninghausen
has offered us.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
subject:
Kent's Triads
Sulphur, Calc Carb, Lycopodium, Skin (Anti-psoric).
Sulphur, Merc Sol, Thuja, Anti-Miasmatic.
Carbo Veg, China, Lycopodium, Flatulence.
Arsenicum alb, Phos, Sulphur, Burning Sensation.
Aconite, Ars Alb, Rhus tox, Restlessness.
Aconite, Chamomilla, Coffea, Pain Sensitivity.
Belladonna, Hyoscyamus, Stramonium, Delirium.
Lachesis, Naja, Crotalus, Snake Remedy Trio.
Kali iod, Sanguinaria, Stannum. Cough after pneumonia.
Aconite, Ignatia, Opium, Fear.
Ant tart, Opium, Nux Mosch, Drowsiness.
Ipecac, Cuprum Met. Veratrum Alb, Collapse in cholera.
Ignatia, Nat Mur, Acid Phos, Grief.
Causticum, Rhus tox, Sulphur, Rheumatism.
Belladonna, Calc Carb, Nat Mur, Upper Lips.
Glonine, Belladonna, Mellilotus, Headaches.
Gelsemium, Causticum, Sepia, Droopy Eyelids.
And from Boenninghausen, one not in Nash's List :
Aconite, Spongia, Hepar sulph, The Croup Powders.
Remember these in order: ASH. That is how they will be needed!
----------------
from Will Taylor discussion:
Kent speaks of viewing the series of remedies sometimes necessary in
bringing about cure as a process of gradual unfolding, without
hypothesizing a hierarchical relationship between the successive
prescriptions. From his lecture on the Second Prescription," What is more
beautiful to look upon than the bud during its hourly changes to the rose
in its bloom. This evolution has so often come to my mind when patiently
awaiting the return of symptoms after the first prescription has exhausted
its curative power. The return symptom image unfolds the knowledge by which
we know whether the first prescription was the specific or the palliative,
i.e., we may know whether the remedy was deep enough to cure all the
deranged vital wrong or simply a
superficially acting remedy, capable of only a temporary effect. The many
things learned by
the action of the first remedy determine the kind of demand made upon the
physician for the
second prescription."
Boenninghausen, in his Concordances, brings to this question his incredible
wealth of clinical
experience and knowledge of the materia medica. These are the most
exhaustive listings of
relationships between remedies that have been produced. Rather than
producing a theoretical scheme for division of the economy of the organism
into "layers", Boenninghausen has provided us with an essentially pragmatic
list of "what is likely to follow what". We find scattered in our
literature references to remedy relationships, e.g., the often cited "Calc
Lyc Sulph" series, references to complementary pairs of remedies such as
Bell/Calc c, Rhus t/Calc p, Puls/Sil, Acon/Sulph, Ign/Nat m, Apis/Nat m,
etc.; and Gibson Miller has given us the list of remedy relations found in
the back of current editions of Kent's Repertory; but we find nowhere as
extensive a listing of these relationships of remedies as Boenninghausen
has offered us.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]