Abrams, Grimmer, and water...
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:07 am
Dear JW, all,
..part of the operation of the machine....
And the other topic:... memory of water....
On http://www.weltimtropfen.com/forschung_ergebnis.html you'll find the
results of an interesting research (in German):
Several persons gave drops of tap water on a glass slide to be analysed
with a miscroscope (dark field).
The same tap water was used for everyone.
But when the water dried, the cristals were different: on the website
mentioned above you can see 4 'provers' (column) and each made 4 drops
(row).
You can easily see that the differences between provers were enormous.
Also interesting:
they did similar experiments with saliva of persons, before and after
phoning with a mobile phone.
On http://www.weltimtropfen.com/forschung.html you see the results:
left column first 3 rows: saliva before phone call.
right column first 3 rows: after handling a mobile phone (without
talking) for about 2 minutes.
Last row is water from the Bodensee (large lake in Germany) which was
exposed to the electromagnetic field for 2 minutes.
You can clearly see the differences: the structure is poorer, much more
rigid.
-------
I think the influence of the homoeopath can be immense (in using
machines as well as without them). And at least the homoeopath should be
aware of it.....
Best,
Gaby
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gaby Rottler
Germany
rottler@curantur.de
http://www.curantur.de
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
..part of the operation of the machine....
And the other topic:... memory of water....
On http://www.weltimtropfen.com/forschung_ergebnis.html you'll find the
results of an interesting research (in German):
Several persons gave drops of tap water on a glass slide to be analysed
with a miscroscope (dark field).
The same tap water was used for everyone.
But when the water dried, the cristals were different: on the website
mentioned above you can see 4 'provers' (column) and each made 4 drops
(row).
You can easily see that the differences between provers were enormous.
Also interesting:
they did similar experiments with saliva of persons, before and after
phoning with a mobile phone.
On http://www.weltimtropfen.com/forschung.html you see the results:
left column first 3 rows: saliva before phone call.
right column first 3 rows: after handling a mobile phone (without
talking) for about 2 minutes.
Last row is water from the Bodensee (large lake in Germany) which was
exposed to the electromagnetic field for 2 minutes.
You can clearly see the differences: the structure is poorer, much more
rigid.
-------
I think the influence of the homoeopath can be immense (in using
machines as well as without them). And at least the homoeopath should be
aware of it.....
Best,
Gaby
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gaby Rottler
Germany
rottler@curantur.de
http://www.curantur.de
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~