Minutus

I spoke to the patient today as he had to change his appointment and
he said that the acne was the best it had ever been. So the moral of
THIS particular story was that I was correct to go for the Causticum
which also had a lot of his M & E's as well as the acne back rather
than the Verat which had all his M &E's but none of the acne
symptoms!! Lets hope the improvement continues.

Regards
Rochelle

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "rochelle" wrote:
I was in a quandary today with a patient - a teenager with acne on
his back. I gave him Sulphur 200 last time (he theorises and
studies philosophy) and the only change has been that the acne
flares up and then goes down repeatedly which it hadn't done
before. When I was reflecting on his case last time while I was
typing it up I thought of Verat.Al and on questioning him today I
really think it suits him with the M and E's. The only trouble is
there are no proving symptoms that I can find anywhere for this Rx
to do with acne on the back or anything similar so I chickened out
and gave him a dose of Causticum which was actually the top Rx in
my rep. My question is would you prescribe on just the M and E's
with none of the presenting physicals or even really many of the
generals

Regards
Rochelle
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--- End forwarded message ---