Singh's method.
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 10:49 pm
Sadly, Pritam Singh died several years ago. Perhaps that is why Roger Dyson wrote the book.
Was it based on thin evidence? I thought it was based on Hahnemann's Chronic Diseases
Annie
Finrod wrote:
And what about INDIVIDUALISATION?
What worries me about books such as 'Classical Homoeopathy Revisited' is
that it is based on the thinnest ever evidence from some work Hn did and
never followed on.
Such books are published and in my view mis-lead a lot of people. The people
who write such books often find the method is futile and give up, but then
never write about the fact that they have changed their ways.
What I would like to know if the authors are still carrying on with this
method. Does any one have any info on it?
Rgds
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, send a message with the subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.
Yahoo! Groups Links
Annie Summers LCH
Homeopath
So neither ought you to attempt to cure the body without the soul
Plato
---------------------------------
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Was it based on thin evidence? I thought it was based on Hahnemann's Chronic Diseases
Annie
Finrod wrote:
And what about INDIVIDUALISATION?
What worries me about books such as 'Classical Homoeopathy Revisited' is
that it is based on the thinnest ever evidence from some work Hn did and
never followed on.
Such books are published and in my view mis-lead a lot of people. The people
who write such books often find the method is futile and give up, but then
never write about the fact that they have changed their ways.
What I would like to know if the authors are still carrying on with this
method. Does any one have any info on it?
Rgds
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, send a message with the subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.
Yahoo! Groups Links
Annie Summers LCH
Homeopath
So neither ought you to attempt to cure the body without the soul
Plato
---------------------------------
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]