Synthesizing rubrics - David Little/All
Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 1:32 am
Yes, I realize this. But for the purpose of utilizing all of the reps at
our disposal, and using them to "assemble" rubrics to meet unique
requirements, one must first be assured that the rubrics available offer the
most complete selection of remedies, and for this, wouldn't a current
repertory prevail? Albeit, I realize that "complete" is of no use unless it
also "accurate".
Also, if I, for instance, need a rubric for regurgitation of food agg. by
farinaceous, there is no such rubric, and Boenninghausen doesn't even have
regurgitation or eructation of food. So, using Synthesis, for example, I
would have to take "STOMACH, Eructations, type of, food" and intersect it
with "GENERALS, Food and Drinks, agg. farinaceous", eliminating all of the
remedies that do not appear in both rubrics. The question is: Does this
produce a reliable rubric?
Toni
our disposal, and using them to "assemble" rubrics to meet unique
requirements, one must first be assured that the rubrics available offer the
most complete selection of remedies, and for this, wouldn't a current
repertory prevail? Albeit, I realize that "complete" is of no use unless it
also "accurate".
Also, if I, for instance, need a rubric for regurgitation of food agg. by
farinaceous, there is no such rubric, and Boenninghausen doesn't even have
regurgitation or eructation of food. So, using Synthesis, for example, I
would have to take "STOMACH, Eructations, type of, food" and intersect it
with "GENERALS, Food and Drinks, agg. farinaceous", eliminating all of the
remedies that do not appear in both rubrics. The question is: Does this
produce a reliable rubric?
Toni