Minutus

"It was a continually repeated fact that the non-venereal chronic diseases, after being time and again removed homoeopathically by the remedies fully proved up to the present time, always returned in a more or less varied form and with new symptoms, or reappeared annually with an increase of complaints. This fact gave me the first clew that the Homoeopathic physician with such a chronic (non-venereal) case, yea in all cases of (non-venereal) chronic disease, has not only to combat the disease presented before his eyes, and must not view and treat it as if it were a well-defined disease, to be speedily and permanently destroyed and healed by ordinary homoeopathic remedies but that he has always to encounter only some separate fragment of a more deep-seated original disease."
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Only slight paraphrasing:

[First sentence to me seems great as it stands. Then-] This fact gave me
the first clue that, in all cases of (non-venereal) chronic disease, the
homeopathic physician must do more than simply treat the disease presenting
before his eyes. He must not view the presenting symptoms as if they were a
well-defined disease, to be speedily and permanently healed by ordinary
homeopathic remedies, but instead he must view the presenting picture as one
perhaps small part of a more deep-seated original disease.
on 4/1/04 4:22 AM, Farbod Rahnamai at frahnama@privatemail.me.uk wrote: