Digest Number 1413
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 11:17 am
Dear Winston,
you are definitely right, others among them Lois Hoffer, have suggested
a different date, most probable seems to be 1863. The error seems to
have occured in the original letter.
Well, in this case, as numbers are involved, I wouldn't call it dylexia,
but dyscalculia.
All the best
Claudia
you are definitely right, others among them Lois Hoffer, have suggested
a different date, most probable seems to be 1863. The error seems to
have occured in the original letter.
Well, in this case, as numbers are involved, I wouldn't call it dylexia,
but dyscalculia.
All the best
Claudia