Constitutional [was: Help on constitutional]
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 4:36 am
Hi Venkat,
Just as an aside (and maybe repeating what you know quite well), one reason
for having questions on the issue of "constitutional remedy" is that the
term is used in different ways by different folks. Eizayaga has one meaning
-- basically, the person's healthiest state; innate characteristics that
we're born with and which are not removeable -- while Kentians (and who?)
have another -- basically meaning, as I would put it, "current chronic
picture, taking in the largest reliable totality that I can find". Or, "the
remedy for what ails ya, non-acute." Which would NOT necessarily be a/the
miasmatic remedy, tho it could be. At least, that's the way I always
understood the term until I learned about Eizayaga.
Does that work for you? (Or would anyone like to comment?)
Shannon
on 1/7/04 9:26 PM, J.VENKATA SUBRAMANIAN at apexpreci2000@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Just as an aside (and maybe repeating what you know quite well), one reason
for having questions on the issue of "constitutional remedy" is that the
term is used in different ways by different folks. Eizayaga has one meaning
-- basically, the person's healthiest state; innate characteristics that
we're born with and which are not removeable -- while Kentians (and who?)
have another -- basically meaning, as I would put it, "current chronic
picture, taking in the largest reliable totality that I can find". Or, "the
remedy for what ails ya, non-acute." Which would NOT necessarily be a/the
miasmatic remedy, tho it could be. At least, that's the way I always
understood the term until I learned about Eizayaga.
Does that work for you? (Or would anyone like to comment?)
Shannon
on 1/7/04 9:26 PM, J.VENKATA SUBRAMANIAN at apexpreci2000@yahoo.co.in wrote: