Ascending or descending?
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003 10:31 pm
Some of you have written about prescribing descending potencies
(starting with a high potency and then issuing lower potencies) as a
way of avoiding aggravations, whereas I had always understood that
the standard method (if there is one!) should start with a lower
potency and then issue ascending potencies when that potency no
longer affects. What are your experiences?
When I try to explain homeopathic potencies to people, I describe the
human being ("economy" in the earlier texts) as a bundle of
fibers, some of which get out of whack (provide sound effects here:
"sproinggggg"). Homeopathic remedies "twang" the system,
somewhat like a tuning fork, to bring the fibers back into line,
letting the vital force/immune system restore itself. Lower
potencies effect the outer fibers (more surface in space and time) while the
more attenuated higher potencies can slip in deeper and "twang"
interior fibers (deeper and more mental/emotional fibers, as well as
more chronic.) Do you think this explanatory model is accurate?
(starting with a high potency and then issuing lower potencies) as a
way of avoiding aggravations, whereas I had always understood that
the standard method (if there is one!) should start with a lower
potency and then issue ascending potencies when that potency no
longer affects. What are your experiences?
When I try to explain homeopathic potencies to people, I describe the
human being ("economy" in the earlier texts) as a bundle of
fibers, some of which get out of whack (provide sound effects here:
"sproinggggg"). Homeopathic remedies "twang" the system,
somewhat like a tuning fork, to bring the fibers back into line,
letting the vital force/immune system restore itself. Lower
potencies effect the outer fibers (more surface in space and time) while the
more attenuated higher potencies can slip in deeper and "twang"
interior fibers (deeper and more mental/emotional fibers, as well as
more chronic.) Do you think this explanatory model is accurate?