The nature of the dynamis ... was potentizedvaccin/ homeopathy or isopathy
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2003 11:46 pm
Joy wrote:
Fascinating! Joy, I'd be very interested (genuinely!) in where you're seeing
the Arnica state because I'm in the middle of a proving right now and it
could be instructive to look at possible relationships between the remedy
and Arnica. (It's not Arnica.) I'd be very grateful if you could you email
me off-list about this.
the
not
????? I don't think what I was trying to communicate has succeeded in
getting across again. Perhaps it's just not going to. I can see what I'm
trying to describe very clearly, but your impression of if that you're
reflecting back to me just isn't the same. What I was referring to was a
*fundamental* state of perfection. The challenge of better health and
healing is constantly there throughout our lives in all we confront during
the course of it -- all the energetic in-form-ation that resonates
discordantly. Imperfections/discordant notes/challenges, call them what you
will, do indeed make the world more interesting, and without them we'd
probably never have the motivation to grow and learn.
This is different from saying that we're full of imperfections and that's
the fundamental nature of life, which was the impression I got of your way
of seeing it from the following passage:
out
If I got that wrong though, please correct me. (Though if you see yourself
as being in an Aurum state then the striving for perfection vs. unredeemable
failure polarity of the remedy isn't far away from what I thought you were
saying.)
I know Hahnemann talks about things like "miasmatic taint": he wasn't free
from the Garden of Eden influence either. But the point I'm trying to make
here is that if we see things like our inherited disease predispositions as
such, in exactly those terms, then it already biases us to reacting
negatively towards them. If, on the other hand, we adopt a neutral
position -- which is the idea of the discordant note -- then we have no bias
towards responding in any particular direction. This gives us a greater
degree of freedom to grasp the opportunity of transcendence that's being
presented to us without having to suffer unduly for it. Karen expressed it
beautifully in her post on the MS thread. It's about seeing the transcendent
potential inherent in discordance. Giving the experience meaning and value,
and extracting learning from it.
Life will always present challenges which we can get stuck with, miasms or
no miasms, so I'm not quite sure how you see that homeopathy wouldn't be
required if they didn't exist. I said that miasms are hard to treat because
they relate to widespread and fundamental conceptions about life that are
held as true by a very great number of people. If we live immersed in that
energy, then it's quite some journey to get to the other side of it. But
again, it does rather depend on how you conceptualise miasms. Perhaps it's
our differing concepts that are creating this impasse in understanding.
Nevertheless, I've enjoyed the exchange. Thanks!
Regards
Wendy
http://www.smeddum.net/
Fascinating! Joy, I'd be very interested (genuinely!) in where you're seeing
the Arnica state because I'm in the middle of a proving right now and it
could be instructive to look at possible relationships between the remedy
and Arnica. (It's not Arnica.) I'd be very grateful if you could you email
me off-list about this.
the
not
????? I don't think what I was trying to communicate has succeeded in
getting across again. Perhaps it's just not going to. I can see what I'm
trying to describe very clearly, but your impression of if that you're
reflecting back to me just isn't the same. What I was referring to was a
*fundamental* state of perfection. The challenge of better health and
healing is constantly there throughout our lives in all we confront during
the course of it -- all the energetic in-form-ation that resonates
discordantly. Imperfections/discordant notes/challenges, call them what you
will, do indeed make the world more interesting, and without them we'd
probably never have the motivation to grow and learn.
This is different from saying that we're full of imperfections and that's
the fundamental nature of life, which was the impression I got of your way
of seeing it from the following passage:
out
If I got that wrong though, please correct me. (Though if you see yourself
as being in an Aurum state then the striving for perfection vs. unredeemable
failure polarity of the remedy isn't far away from what I thought you were
saying.)
I know Hahnemann talks about things like "miasmatic taint": he wasn't free
from the Garden of Eden influence either. But the point I'm trying to make
here is that if we see things like our inherited disease predispositions as
such, in exactly those terms, then it already biases us to reacting
negatively towards them. If, on the other hand, we adopt a neutral
position -- which is the idea of the discordant note -- then we have no bias
towards responding in any particular direction. This gives us a greater
degree of freedom to grasp the opportunity of transcendence that's being
presented to us without having to suffer unduly for it. Karen expressed it
beautifully in her post on the MS thread. It's about seeing the transcendent
potential inherent in discordance. Giving the experience meaning and value,
and extracting learning from it.
Life will always present challenges which we can get stuck with, miasms or
no miasms, so I'm not quite sure how you see that homeopathy wouldn't be
required if they didn't exist. I said that miasms are hard to treat because
they relate to widespread and fundamental conceptions about life that are
held as true by a very great number of people. If we live immersed in that
energy, then it's quite some journey to get to the other side of it. But
again, it does rather depend on how you conceptualise miasms. Perhaps it's
our differing concepts that are creating this impasse in understanding.
Nevertheless, I've enjoyed the exchange. Thanks!
Regards
Wendy
http://www.smeddum.net/