Atiq
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 10:01 pm
Dear Colleague Atiq
It was not my intension to silence you - not at all. IN fact I was inviting
to explain yourself more - not less. How else are we to learn? If my remarks
- strong though they may have been - have caused offence, then I apologise.
However, your mails came through as sounding a bit like the allopathic use
of Homeopathic remedies. This I disagree with most strongly as it often
leads to suppression.
However, if a patient is suffering from Kidney stones etc then the remedy
which will help dispose the stones (cause of the pain) naturally is the
best.
But then we are talking acutes (although the formation of the stones
themselves is a chronic problem). And then when the patient has relief from
the kidney stones (and the case stops being 'one-sided) we can then deal
with the chronic.
Of course the symptoms of the patient under pain are interesting to as to
the character of the patient.
Humbly
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
It was not my intension to silence you - not at all. IN fact I was inviting
to explain yourself more - not less. How else are we to learn? If my remarks
- strong though they may have been - have caused offence, then I apologise.
However, your mails came through as sounding a bit like the allopathic use
of Homeopathic remedies. This I disagree with most strongly as it often
leads to suppression.
However, if a patient is suffering from Kidney stones etc then the remedy
which will help dispose the stones (cause of the pain) naturally is the
best.
But then we are talking acutes (although the formation of the stones
themselves is a chronic problem). And then when the patient has relief from
the kidney stones (and the case stops being 'one-sided) we can then deal
with the chronic.
Of course the symptoms of the patient under pain are interesting to as to
the character of the patient.
Humbly
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]