Minutus

Hi Colleagues

I think I may have cottoned on to what homoeobond is doing.

He takes part in various forums.

He sees people asking these type of question.

He then posts them to us.

One of us will give an absolutely brilliant answer.

He then uses the answer from Minutus to reply to the question in the other
forums.

Result: Every body else on the other forums is led to believe that 007 is a
leading light of Homoeopathy.

I think because he asks such basic questions, our answer should be basic too
(Hey common that is how homoeopathy work - similar treatment): "Go and read
Aphs X, Y, Z in the Organon and if you do not understand come back. Also,
while you are at it, please read the rest of it."

[Reminds me of the New York cop who answered a friend of mine asking for
directions "Go & buy a map"]

This saves lengthy answers, has not rejected 007 and is in fact educational.

Rgds
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi Soroush,

I like the approach you're suggesting!
Will also be educational for us (for me, anyway) to find the sources to
recommend him to.

Now if he were representing himself as brilliant thru sharing *our*
brilliance, I wouldn't mind at all, as that would entail sharing good
information in answer to genuine questions. Sadly, tho, from what I have
seen him posting here and elsewhere, his goal seems instead to be the spread
of *mis*information, and dissension. E.g. see what he's beeing doing with
the "healthy patient" bit -- as I said, either he is lying about his
background, or he knows perfectly well that he's asking really dumb
questions.

Either way, tho, your approach sounds terrific to me!

on 10/12/03 2:26 AM, Finrod at finrod@webstar.co.uk wrote:

Dear Saroush,

You said:


** You're correct on this. You can find some of this here where he
defends homeopathy to the hilt:

http://www.sjwinfo.org/forums/GeneralDi ... en54.shtml

Regards,
Catherine