Page 1 of 1

A problem case-more

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 5:36 pm
by J.VENKATASUBRAMANIAN
Hi Rochelle,
I forgot to give you another central rubric
climb desire to- bell, hyos, stram

Together with all other rubrics bell is the undoubted similimum.
This person was needing bell for a long time.

Regards
Venkat

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "J.venkatasubramanian"
wrote:
I
this
your

Re: A problem case-more

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 6:16 pm
by Rochelle

I never knew there was such a rubric!! I found in the Complete millenium

CLIMB, desire to (8)

1 bell, 1 brass-o, 1 cic, 1 falco-p, 1 hell, 1 hyos, 1 mosch, 1 stram
Thanks

Rochelle

www.rochellemarsden.co.uk

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: A problem case-more

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 8:49 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Hi Venkat,

What an interesting analysis! (Puzzling to me, but...)
I'm curious, tho, how long you would wait between giving the 30c and giving
the higher potencies? It would make me awfully nervous to give a patient
such high potencies of a remedy that hadn't given any response in lower
ones!!! E.g., if there were no response up to, say, 1M, would you still go
ahead with giving 10M and CM? And again, how long would you wait in
between?

Curious and fascinated!
Shannon
on 9/9/03 10:35 AM, J.venkatasubramanian at apexpreci2000@yahoo.co.in wrote:

Re: A problem case-more

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2003 2:13 am
by J.VENKATASUBRAMANIAN
Hi Shannon,

Dr Sehgall never failed to fascinate me. ( As all things of the mind
do.)He was a original thinker- rose from a government clerk to a
celebrated homeopath.

His PPP method is to find our the present, persistent snd predominant
expression in the patient. They can be even ordinary sentences like
simple questions, or saying, 'I was introduced by my friend to you.
I 've got an appointment'. To this he would have a rubric Attention
desires. Other of his famous rubrics he interpreted from Kent are

1. Light , desire for( He has written a 100 page bookleton this alone)
2. Irritability, painduring
3. Laughing, speaking ,when
4. Disturbed , averse to being
5. Delusions, help calling for
6. Shrieking aid for
7. Conscientious, trifles about/

His conclusion was that the innate characteristics which are
described in our reps as objective generals are unchangeable. Instead
the state of mind at any point of time is indicative of disease and
his expressions are the unmistakable pointers. Hering's law states
that cure is inside out- from centre to periphery. If the periphjery
be the skin, the centre is the mind. Dr Sehgal/s publications (abt
eight in number) are available in Delhi. Any one interested can send
me mail to getthe publisher's address.

Now to the therapeutics. Once three governing rubrics are selected
according to PPP, the common remedy is the similimum. No grades are
considered. No miasmatic angle. To Sehgal,acute or chronic disease
never made a diffence. He called chronics disease of degeneration and
acutes as diseases of regeneration.

Once the similimum is administered, we have to look for
neutralisation of the expressions. This also means the neutralisation
of the suffering of the outermost layer, i.e, the recent most pain.
Usually 30 c one dose would do. If not , if the doc is sure of his
rubrics, gradually go up to cm in weekly interviews. Once the
outermost amelioration starts, the doc should look for an aggravation-
of previous ailments in reverse order. They would pass as storms but
with the patient in a better mental state. Dr Sehgal gives us about
the nature and duration of these acute attacks. Usually they last an
odd number of days, hours, minutes and seconds. ( 5 days is usual
with the middle day being the worst). This train is unstoppable and
the patient to be kept up in sac lac. This regeneration process may
well last more than a year. All the while the single dose of
similimum will act. Even acon is like this here to act for months. Dr
Sehgal says bell covers 40% of cases.

Best
Venkat

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Bob&Shannon
wrote:
and giving
patient
lower
still go
wrote:
Homoeopathy and
regarding the
document read or
and/or email
use remains
individual
special, punitive
with the
digest.
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/