Page 1 of 1

undigested statement

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2003 9:52 am
by Homeo Bond 007
A statement is made by a member on the following link

http://www.hpathy.com/forum/display_top ... readPage=1

Well-indicated and well-not-indicated remedies

When homeopaths take full case history and select a remedy which strictly
fit on patients symptoms then we call it well-indicated remedy. In other
words you can call this remedy “SIMILIMUM” remedy. This similimum has all
the power of the world to cure the patient. This remedy is well-indicated.

If does not work then few homeopaths suggests that give a dose of Sulph,
Thuja or any other remedy which is not “SIMILIMUM” that is
well-not-indicated.

Please offer your comment on:

When a well-indicated will not work then how a well-not-indicated can give
you result according to similia similibus curenter principle.

Homeo Bond 007
(In search of homeopathy)

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp

Re: undigested statement

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:19 pm
by Shannon Nelson
If you are a homeopath, you know the answer to this:
"Indicated" can be according to a number of different criteria, including
*but not limited to* totality of the presenting symptoms.
on 3/20/03 8:39 AM, Homeo Bond 007 at homeobond007@hotmail.com wrote: