Ft nt 210 / Cruelty?
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2003 12:35 pm
I believe Hn says words to the effect that for every disease on Earth, the
Almighty has created a cure (all we need to do is search and find it).
Through Hn's discovery of homoeopathy, we now have the tools for our search
and progress (to achieve the higher goals for which we were created).
However, we must also appreciate that Hn on a regular basis changed his
lines of thinking and as his ideas developed.
In fact if you look at the Org 6ed, you will see that he has deleted
sections from Org 5 and or added to them.
Had he lived on, it is likely that sections of Org 6 would be severely
chopped and changed. He had problems getting his books published don't
forget!
Also he was no 'innocent' prophet of God so he - like the rest of us - was
prone to errors of thought and action.
However, in coming back to fn210, I do not believe that God has created
people who are cruel by nature.
There may be many reasons for their behaviour - maintaining, environmental
or inherited causes etc.
The behaviour of a normal healthy person needs to be balanced. So they need
to be compassionate and merciful, but also get angry and upset and violent
.... but all with in certain checks and balances. When these become
excessive (even compassion) the person is diseased.
So if a person can be described as CRUEL, then it means that their
compassion is weak - they are therefore off-balance and so they are
diseased.
If after treatment the mild and meek suddenly shows symptoms of cruelty;
(and friends and relatives advise that the pt was like this before they
became ill) my view would be that they were diseased before and all we have
done is to have removed one layer of the totality of the symptoms. And
importantly, these symptoms were masked by the symptoms of last disease. In
fact it would seem that a stronger disease had attached the VF while it was
suffering from the previous. Again as Hn says the body can not be affected
by two diseases at the same time, the stronger always wins and in doing so
the symptoms of the weaker disease are suppressed.
This means that if after homoeopathic treatment my patient develops symptoms
that they had before they were ill, I would conclude that my original
prescription was spot on and I am observing nothing but the Return of Old
Symptoms.
If we are dealing with a simple case, then I would wait and watch to see if
these pass under the influence of the current remedy. However, if these
symptoms persist, then they too would need treatment in turn.
Rgds
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Almighty has created a cure (all we need to do is search and find it).
Through Hn's discovery of homoeopathy, we now have the tools for our search
and progress (to achieve the higher goals for which we were created).
However, we must also appreciate that Hn on a regular basis changed his
lines of thinking and as his ideas developed.
In fact if you look at the Org 6ed, you will see that he has deleted
sections from Org 5 and or added to them.
Had he lived on, it is likely that sections of Org 6 would be severely
chopped and changed. He had problems getting his books published don't
forget!
Also he was no 'innocent' prophet of God so he - like the rest of us - was
prone to errors of thought and action.
However, in coming back to fn210, I do not believe that God has created
people who are cruel by nature.
There may be many reasons for their behaviour - maintaining, environmental
or inherited causes etc.
The behaviour of a normal healthy person needs to be balanced. So they need
to be compassionate and merciful, but also get angry and upset and violent
.... but all with in certain checks and balances. When these become
excessive (even compassion) the person is diseased.
So if a person can be described as CRUEL, then it means that their
compassion is weak - they are therefore off-balance and so they are
diseased.
If after treatment the mild and meek suddenly shows symptoms of cruelty;
(and friends and relatives advise that the pt was like this before they
became ill) my view would be that they were diseased before and all we have
done is to have removed one layer of the totality of the symptoms. And
importantly, these symptoms were masked by the symptoms of last disease. In
fact it would seem that a stronger disease had attached the VF while it was
suffering from the previous. Again as Hn says the body can not be affected
by two diseases at the same time, the stronger always wins and in doing so
the symptoms of the weaker disease are suppressed.
This means that if after homoeopathic treatment my patient develops symptoms
that they had before they were ill, I would conclude that my original
prescription was spot on and I am observing nothing but the Return of Old
Symptoms.
If we are dealing with a simple case, then I would wait and watch to see if
these pass under the influence of the current remedy. However, if these
symptoms persist, then they too would need treatment in turn.
Rgds
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]