Def constitutional
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2003 1:59 pm
Hi shannon,
My understanding is of a remedy which covers the overall picture, *as
opposed to one covering the local/chief complaint* alone. There is no
assumption that there is one remedy which will cover *everything* or is the
only one needed (though i will be happy if it were that simple !)
about what this overall picture should include, i have not strictly followed
aph 6. ("...only the deviations from the former healthy state "). Like joy
said in another post many traits/behaviour patterns ( which would not
strictly fall under the "sick state") etc have guided to the right remedy.
Food desires aversions / sleep position etc. also come to mind
regards,
Arun
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
My understanding is of a remedy which covers the overall picture, *as
opposed to one covering the local/chief complaint* alone. There is no
assumption that there is one remedy which will cover *everything* or is the
only one needed (though i will be happy if it were that simple !)
about what this overall picture should include, i have not strictly followed
aph 6. ("...only the deviations from the former healthy state "). Like joy
said in another post many traits/behaviour patterns ( which would not
strictly fall under the "sick state") etc have guided to the right remedy.
Food desires aversions / sleep position etc. also come to mind
regards,
Arun
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]