seems to have been off on a fanciful lark
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2002 9:36 pm
I read that post trying to find any
obvious or subtle put down. I guess Dave just has to fall off the
face of the earth. At worst he seems to hold very strong opinions
which he backs up with MM, REP, etc. That essence on Cuprum did in
fact seem fanciful when compared to the MM. There are many voices
here on this list and I think he speaks with a needed conservative
(classical?) view. At least if the board is going to be available to
every kind of view re practice of homoeopathy, then this board needs
Dave to present more of a balance. I have not read every post from
the past but it seems people may be gettinfg a little...whats the
word...unduly offended. Keep up
the good work Dave, I look foward to reading your posts.
obvious or subtle put down. I guess Dave just has to fall off the
face of the earth. At worst he seems to hold very strong opinions
which he backs up with MM, REP, etc. That essence on Cuprum did in
fact seem fanciful when compared to the MM. There are many voices
here on this list and I think he speaks with a needed conservative
(classical?) view. At least if the board is going to be available to
every kind of view re practice of homoeopathy, then this board needs
Dave to present more of a balance. I have not read every post from
the past but it seems people may be gettinfg a little...whats the
word...unduly offended. Keep up
the good work Dave, I look foward to reading your posts.