Minutus

I thank you very much for your replies. -"germ" apparently means the chem. element germanium, according to the Compl. Rep. list of rem. abbrevations. That was new to me, I shall definitely have a look at this rem. some time close. For the last rubric "prisoner, she is a ~", which also has two birds of prey, my suspicion is that the proving result has not much to do with the animals themselves, but rather with the fact that the individuals were kept indeed and hence "were prisoners". For the falcon I know this definitely, as I have read about the proving some time back, for "haliae-lc.", i.e. white-headed -eagle, I assume it was similar, Zoo-bird perhaps. Which, if right, indicates that this should always be included in the remedy term as well, like "falco p. disc(iplinatus)" or "captiv." or something, and that comparative provings of captive, wild ( e.g. lost feathers ) and killed individual animals of the same species are likely to yield different results ! Regards, Panthera

_____________________________________________________________
Free email on the Net's premier homeopathy site ---> http://www.homeopathyhome.net

_____________________________________________________________
Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get you@yourchoice.com w/No Ads, 6MB, POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag

Hi Panthera,

For interest, in Jeremy Sherr's proving of falco-p, he does indeed use the
name "Falco Peregrinus Disciplinatus". So evidently he agrees with you!


On the other hand, in some provings that the results have seemed to include
traits that would *not* apparently have been shared by the source animal,
and it seemed as tho there was also some "group memory" coming thru. If I
can locate examples, I'll put them up. (I seem to be having a problem with
specific examples lately!)

Cheers,
Shannon
on 11/4/02 4:55 AM, A.Panthera Johannides at a.panthera@homeopathyhome.net
wrote:

The potencies of the the Bald Eagle were made from a small amount of blood
from a sample drawn from a mature, male, bald eagle at a rescue centre. The
bird had been rescued after been shot in the winf and foot. He was
permanently crippled, unable to fly and missing some right claws. (Dynamic
Provings, vol.1 , p. 229)

Jon van Hoffen

--- In minutus@y..., Robert&Shannon Nelson wrote:
Hi you & all,
use the
you!
Yes, I quoted him in writing this, and like that he made the
distinction.
include
animal,
thru.
- Did not understand that one: "group memory" - who's and how
?
If I
problem with
Same to
you,
Panthera ( writing through Yh. to be able to include prev. Post,
hence the different address )

--- In minutus@y..., "Jon van Hoffen" wrote:
blood
centre. The
(Dynamic
________
Thanks for the suppl. inf.. The book is already on my future reading
list. I am sure its/his condition would have shown in the proving in
some way. Would be interesting to do "comparative" pr. research then,
healthy Zoo bird, wild one that dropped feather somewhere, chick, dead
one ( i.e. died naturally, not to invade in life unnecessarily for
science ) etc. with pr. setting of same standart. And it sure matters
in the future if new "supply" is needed from the wild for rem.
manufact. that source matches prov.
source.
Panthera