Minutus

Dear Dave

You said
"Nuts are universally affected by greater or lesser degrees of contamination with mycotoxins.

Peanut/aflatoxin is the most well known nut allergen."

Why do you think organically grown nuts would be free of this contamination?

I think it is a problem with how the nuts are stored not how they are grown.

Also there seems to be a rise in allergy to nuts and I think one of reasons is that one of the ingredients of at least one of the Vaccines had nut oil in it (as well as mercury!!??) so perhaps when this is introduced to the body tissues other than through the mouth, then the body reacts to it.

I got the following from
http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/vac ... unity.html
CAN VACCINES CAUSE FOOD ALLERGIES?

JAMA 2001 Apr 4;285(13): 1746-8 Detection of peanut allergens in breast milk of lactating women states, "Most individuals who react to peanuts do so on their first known exposure".........and concluded "Peanut protein secreted into breast milk of lactating women following maternal dietary ingestion. Exposure to peanut protein during breastfeeding is a route of occult exposure that may result in sensitization of at-risk infants." PMID 11277829

Women have been ingesting peanut protein while breastfeeding for decades. What has changed in the last 15 years to cause infants to develop life-threatening allergies to this legume? One change has been the vaccination schedule.

The Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1999 Jul, 119(3):205-11 Pertussis adjuvant prolongs intestinal hypersensitivity concludes: Our findings indicate nanogram quantities of PT (pertussis toxin), when administered with a food protein, result in long-term sensitization to the antigen, and altered intestinal neuroimmune function. These data suggest exposure to bacterial pathogens may prolong the normally transient immune responsiveness to inert food antigens. PMID 10436392

Also and very importantly, have look at http://www.altcorp.com/adjuvants.htm
I quote:
============
"The use of adjuvants enables the use of less antigen to achieve the desired immune response, and this reduces vaccine production costs. With a few exceptions, adjuvants are foreign to the body and cause adverse reactions.
Part 1 deals with the following types of adjuvants (after Gupta et al, 1993):

Oil emulsions
Freund's emulsified oil adjuvants (complete and incomplete)
Arlacel A
Mineral oil
Emulsified peanut oil adjuvant (adjuvant 65)
Mineral compounds
Bacterial products
Bordetella pertussis
Corynebacterium granulosum derived P40 component
Lipopolysaccharide
Mycobacteriwn and its components
Cholera toxin
Liposomes
Immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMs)"
===================

If my assumption is found to be correct that through vaccination the person has become hypersensitive to the substances in the vaccine, then perhaps there is a chance to work on it and I would like to see whether giving the vaccines in potency would solve the problem or not - I think it is well worth a try.

Regards
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi Soroush,

I'm inclined to believe that vaccinations would, in general, further hinder
any immune system reaction to anything--given their nature.

Allergies severe enough to result in anaphalaxis are just a sign of
profoundly compromised immune system. Vaccines can do this no matter what
their ingredient lists include.

Regards,
Nancy

Dear Soroush,
This sounds rather interesting. Any idea on how to find out which vacc. had
peanut oil in them?
Theresa

Soroush-

To answer your questions / comments.

I agree that peanut oil in vaccine is likely to be largely responsible for
"epidemic" of peanut allergy/anaphlaxis.
Let us do a group anamnesis
(I found this site while checking to make sure I spelled anamnesis
correctly:
http://theosophy.org/tlodocs/Anamnesis.htm )
-of the human race, specifically focussed on those newly-epidemic "strange,
exceptional, unusual, odd" symptoms which we understand to be leading
pointers toward solving a case homeopathically... and take this collection
of:
ADD, ADHD, MS, anaphlaxis, SID, and so on -- and compare that to the rise
of vaccination, and to various specific vaccinations mass-dispensed at
certain times .. and maybe think of adjuvants along this timeline. I'm
sure we'll find many points of extremely statistically relevant correlation.

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/DailyNew ... ccines.htm
Nuts--
Nuts (especially peanuts, a "ground nut" growing in soil) may be
susceptibile to infestation by various molds (specifically and positively in
the case of peanut, Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus) *during* growth.
Organic produce is generally healthier (in and of itself, and therefore as
food) and is therefor less susceptible to infestation; also, conventional
peanut is grown with very, very high level of toxic pesticide; some residue
of which *will* be in the nuts -unless you choose organic. -Also, organic
nuts are liable to be more carefully handled in drying, and are available
specifically "aflatoxin free"

regards,

Dave Hartley
www.Mr-Notebook.com
www.localcomputermart.com/dave
Seattle, WA 425.820.7443

Has anyone worked with the homeopathic version of the Hib vaccine? Is there
any data on the potentised form? Also, is there a good place to read about
potentised MMR or DPT?
Theresa