Minutus

The issue is to differentiate the explicit name of a dis-ease from the clinical picture, and to pursue a case taking in accordance with some set of rules from a specific paradigm. Dave's descriptive conclusion of the political terrain of the market of healthcare aside, and viewing his description of markers along the path of homeopathy is correct.

I added the inquiry to questions which come to mind are: is the pt. male or
female; is the pt. anorexic, jaundice, vomiting, manifests poor growth,
edemic, dyspeptic, itching eruption about the ankles, and do the diagnostic
tests performed thus far demonstrate an inappropriaate rbc concentrations of
a galactose phosphate or tissue presence of uridyltransferase in lv and rbc?

There is a clear sense of cellular disturbance, perhaps in addition to those
remedies already mentioned you might look at nat-p in both low and high
potency. It functionally acts to transform into an acid and exchanges for
oxygen with an affinity for nerve tissue. I would add lac-h, lac-v, to your
menu of remedies to consider, and perhaps it may prove of value to
repertorise the mother particularly if she is still breast feeding.

From the response indicating that this inquiry has already been done, and that if the remedies mentioned by Dave do not fit, then it follows that there must be, in accordance with the rules of homeopathy, some unusual and specific conditions. This pursuit ought to afford a course of direction for the selection of a remedy.

The issue at this point of the discourse severes from case taking and analysis to one of seeking in principle an allopathic parallel. That is a known treatment protocol for an identified disease. If my reading is correct then basically dave was asserting the need to set aside the 'disease' and complete a more thorough case taking that will allow for the selection of 'the' most appropriate remedy for the energetic picture of this patient. That others may have treated the disease or a case similar will be merely of interest but will nonetheless require a contrast of clinical manifestations that will be driven from a thorough case taking.

In the case at hand, that would follow with the inquiry as to unusual and rare elements to the picture and ultimately then to a remedy or remedies in composition.

If I may offer a parallel example: an attorney, while separating story from relevant information, arrives at a point of establishing an issue which is akin to the mergence of a chief complaint and keynote(s). The attorney must then establish a rule for application which is akin to operating within a set of rules from a specific paradigm. What follows is a conclusion. It is from this point that one looks for case precedent and if found to contrast the fact pattern.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Look, all I wanted to ask the list is if there has been anyone on either of
the lists who may have treated a child with galactokinase deficiency and/or
galactosemia homoeopathically.

The parents asked me if i was aware of any success with treatment. As I was
not aware, I decided to ask the lists, and instead I have been inundated
with lectures about how to do homoeopathy, what I am doing wrong (even
though I haven't actually mentioned anything that i had done) that I should
not be worrying about disease names etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum.

If I get to treat this child, then I will take the case homoeopathically,
as i always do, as i am a Homoeopath! If at this point I have some queries,
i may request some help from the list.

Regards

Robyn

----------
clinical picture, and to pursue a case taking in accordance with some set
of rules from a specific paradigm. Dave's descriptive conclusion of the
political terrain of the market of healthcare aside, and viewing his
description of markers along the path of homeopathy is correct.
male or
diagnostic
of
rbc?
those
for
your
and that if the remedies mentioned by Dave do not fit, then it follows that
there must be, in accordance with the rules of homeopathy, some unusual and
specific conditions. This pursuit ought to afford a course of direction
for the selection of a remedy.
analysis to one of seeking in principle an allopathic parallel. That is a
known treatment protocol for an identified disease. If my reading is
correct then basically dave was asserting the need to set aside the
'disease' and complete a more thorough case taking that will allow for the
selection of 'the' most appropriate remedy for the energetic picture of
this patient. That others may have treated the disease or a case similar
will be merely of interest but will nonetheless require a contrast of
clinical manifestations that will be driven from a thorough case taking.
rare elements to the picture and ultimately then to a remedy or remedies in
composition.
from relevant information, arrives at a point of establishing an issue
which is akin to the mergence of a chief complaint and keynote(s). The
attorney must then establish a rule for application which is akin to
operating within a set of rules from a specific paradigm. What follows is
a conclusion. It is from this point that one looks for case precedent and
if found to contrast the fact pattern.
and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.
subject of 'Digest' to ashahrdar@yahoo.com to receive a single daily
digest.