Page 1 of 1
OT - committee of 300
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 7:23 am
by Dave Hartley
Hi Shannon,
now you're asking after those shadowy figures I alluded to who are at the
pinnacle of the worldly wealth/power pyramid.
committee of 300
http://www.hiddenmysteries.com/item/item84.html
Some other semi-open secrets
Bilderberg
CFR (council on foreign relations, U.S.)
TLC (Tri Lateral Commission, U.S. based, multinational corporate dominated)
Skull & Bones Society (Yale U.)
http://www.trunkerton.fsnet.co.uk/skull.htm
http://www.karenlyster.com/bones.html
RIIA (UK)
the Federal Reserve Banks (privately held U.S. corps.)
http://www.light1998.com/Rothschilds-Bo ... eserve.htm
Some notable authors in these areas
Dr. John Coleman
Antony Sutton
Eustace Mullins
I could go on, but it's only related to homeopathy as indicators of it's
political enemies..
best regards,
Dave Hartley
www.Mr-Notebook.com
www.localcomputermart.com/dave
Seattle, WA 425.820.7443
Asheville, NC 828.285.0240
Re: OT - committee of 300
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 3:47 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Hi Dave,
Yeah, I guess it's off-topic in a way, but also does describe the "context"
we're working in, both legal and otherwise.
This to me is a good example of something that, altho it shouldn't get
extensive discussion here, is in fact a useful thing to make mention of, for
those who want to follow up. (I'd say the same about posts re other
methodologies, BTW...)
Thanks for some very interesting links, in a very depressing sort of way...
Shannon
on 11/11/02 12:26 AM, Dave Hartley at
dave@localcomputermart.com wrote:
worldly wealth/power pyramid.
(snip)
Re: OT - committee of 300
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 7:32 pm
by Natasha Pelech
Dear Dave and Shannon,
Hello! I don't mean to get involved in this OT discussion but....
I heard about this theory (committee of 300) about 5 years ago. I read the book by "Coleman" and while he spins an interesting yarn, with lots of flashy details, it doesn't detract me from the fact that what he supposes is impossible.
For the "committee of 300" to work, the world's politically powerful and financial rich would have to live in agreement. The top 300 families would have to get together and plan out how they are to "dominate the world", etc. If this was actually happening, it would fall apart very quickly due to internal conspiracies.... why settle for being 1 of "300" when you can be #1 or #5 and pursue your personal agenda instead of a "global" one. It also does not take into account the power and influence of families, political and financial, in countries of the Middle East, South Asia, East Asia, SE Asia and the African continent. There are so many uncontrollable variables that it makes this the theory impractical.
Besides, the British royals are credited with much participation in this conspiracy theory whereas we know that the British (German) royals have been the largest supporters of homeopathy in the world.
There are many reasons that homeopathy is "suppressed" or conspired against. The two biggest are reasons are money and education. Those already in a lucrative allopathic practice (Dr's and pharmaceutical companies) have little desire to change, especially since they have been taught and believe that they are helping people. This is where the second "conspiracy" against homeopathy comes, education. It takes a certain type of person to change how they understand the body to work, and therefore change how they view the world. No matter how much progress we make as homeopaths, I don't think we will ever seen homeopathy as the sole, universal medicine. Is that a conspiracy? I don't think so, it is just reality.
Sincerely,
Natasha
Re: OT - committee of 300
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 4:24 am
by Shannon Nelson
Good points, Natasha -- I hope you're right!
I think this is a topic that should continue privately, tho; it could
generate a lot of "traffic" and emotion, but it's not really that much about
homeopathy...
And I'd write more, but kind of tired and rushed right now (sigh, so many
interesting topics I have to spurn -- for now!)
Thanks for the thoughts!
Cheers,
Shannon
on 11/11/02 12:31 PM, Natasha Pelech at
NPelech@Shaw.ca wrote: