law of similars & classical homeopathy
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2002 6:42 pm
Establishing the principle of similia as one of the basis for involvment with this site and classical homeopathy is an incomplete requirement as other paradigms share that principle too.
The law of similia, contraria, equalia find placement in other paradigms. So does the Arndt-Shultz rule.
There is room for synthesis without despoiling the intention to seek that single remedy. There is far more agreement amongst us than differences, and I find no disagreement with Dave or others who argue strenuously, with merit, for adherence to the single remedy protocol that follows the classcal procedure of case taking. Case taking is procedural; while the principles are our substance. And they find application in more than one paradigm.
As a physician I find a burden not only to experience growth in my field of healthcare, but to become edified with other forms of healthcare. And in so doing find synthesis, agreement, impoved collaboration with physicians of other paradigms and ultimately improved benefit to the patient who we serve.
The disruptive discourse is not unique to minutus, it is a condition experienced elsewhere, where information doesn't fit into a package. I have on earlier posts indicated my credentials so the reader may reflect their intention, and have also indicated my experience is eclectic. It has however always been based upon principle, a finding of a Dx that generates a Tx.
I extend good thoughts to all
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The law of similia, contraria, equalia find placement in other paradigms. So does the Arndt-Shultz rule.
There is room for synthesis without despoiling the intention to seek that single remedy. There is far more agreement amongst us than differences, and I find no disagreement with Dave or others who argue strenuously, with merit, for adherence to the single remedy protocol that follows the classcal procedure of case taking. Case taking is procedural; while the principles are our substance. And they find application in more than one paradigm.
As a physician I find a burden not only to experience growth in my field of healthcare, but to become edified with other forms of healthcare. And in so doing find synthesis, agreement, impoved collaboration with physicians of other paradigms and ultimately improved benefit to the patient who we serve.
The disruptive discourse is not unique to minutus, it is a condition experienced elsewhere, where information doesn't fit into a package. I have on earlier posts indicated my credentials so the reader may reflect their intention, and have also indicated my experience is eclectic. It has however always been based upon principle, a finding of a Dx that generates a Tx.
I extend good thoughts to all
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]