Minutus

Q: Why are homeopaths antivax if technically vaccines are "homeopathic"?
A: Although using similitude, conventional vax are in the toxic molecular phase, and poisoned with adjuvants. Supramolecular prophylaxis uses the non-toxic plasma phase of immunogens w/o adjuvants
Follow on Twitter @JBennethJournal
Read The John Benneth Journal at johnbenneth.wordpress.com
Call 503–819–7777 or Skype John Benneth, Portland, Oregon USA

Dear john

On what basis can it be said that they are homeopathic?
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 05 March 2019 18:46
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Why are homeopaths antivax if technically vaccines are "homeopathic"?
Q: Why are homeopaths antivax if technically vaccines are "homeopathic"?
A: Although using similitude, conventional vax are in the toxic molecular phase, and poisoned with adjuvants. Supramolecular prophylaxis uses the non-toxic plasma phase of immunogens w/o adjuvants

Follow on Twitter @JBennethJournal

Read The John Benneth Journal at johnbenneth.wordpress.com

Call 503–819–7777 or Skype John Benneth, Portland, Oregon USA

Only because vaccines are made from tiny amounts of the presumed pathogen, which makes minds go to our “motto” of “like treats like”.

So the more nearly correct term would be homeoprophylactic (which I know is highly debated), as it’s “like-treats-possible-future-like” — with the same list of differences and problems.
Another reason I’d note for why homeopathy is really different from mainstream vaccination policy, is the central and crucial idea of “individualization”. We specifically DON’T give every child the same treatment—chosen regardless of their state of health, the nature of their physiology, etc.

And that’s lead homeopaths to understand that some children are more particularly at risk from vaccines, e.g. certain constitutional types (which perhaps would have some correspondence to the category of “slow detoxifiers”?). Understanding which could be SO useful for mainstream docs (and other pro-vaccine people) to be aware of.

Shannon

Hi Shannon

You are absolutely correct. I was commenting because John did not seem to react to it.
In fact if you study the vaccine leaflet, you will notice that it lists all the people who should be excluded but such advice is usually ignored!
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 07 March 2019 16:14
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Why are homeopaths antivax if technically vaccines are "homeopathic"?
Only because vaccines are made from tiny amounts of the presumed pathogen, which makes minds go to our “motto” of “like treats like”.
So the more nearly correct term would be homeoprophylactic (which I know is highly debated), as it’s “like-treats-possible-future-like” — with the same list of differences and problems.
Another reason I’d note for why homeopathy is really different from mainstream vaccination policy, is the central and crucial idea of “individualization”. We specifically DON’T give every child the same treatment—chosen regardless of their state of health, the nature of their physiology, etc.
And that’s lead homeopaths to understand that some children are more particularly at risk from vaccines, e.g. certain constitutional types (which perhaps would have some correspondence to the category of “slow detoxifiers”?). Understanding which could be SO useful for mainstream docs (and other pro-vaccine people) to be aware of.
Shannon

Check out the similia of the first vaccine, cowpox to prevent or cure smallpox.
Follow on Twitter @JBennethJournal
Read The John Benneth Journal at johnbenneth.wordpress.com
Call 503–819–7777 or Skype John Benneth, Portland, Oregon USA