Minutus

"Sue Muller" wrote:
I think the problem with a remedy like "mobile phone" is the lack of
comprehension of the physics of the device. A mobile phone is a
microwave emitter, no different than any other microwave source:
cordless phone, wireless ethernet card, or microwave oven. The remedy
really should be called microwave. It's as if someone wanted to prove
tap water and thought they were proving the type of fixture the water
came through: shower head, faucet, toilet, etc.

--
Bernie Simon http://www.toad.net/~bsimon/

Bernie - I totally agree with you!!

Regards, Rochelle
----------------------------
"The remedy
really should be called microwave. "
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 21/06/02

Bernie wrote:

Certainly a good point, but (IMO) one too hooked into
materialist/reductionist thinking and/or the artifical distinctions that
labels like "microwave" confer.

"Microwave radiation" simply describes a range of radio frequencies and the
purpose for which it's used determines exactly how and in what strength it's
emitted. Mobile Phone is not merely Microwave: it's microwave radiation
pitched at the level required to facilitate verbal communication over
distance, that distance being greater than Cordless Phone and Wireless
Ethernet Card, and another species altogether from Microwave Oven.
Cellphones radiate power in the 0.5 to 3 watt range, at frequencies ranging
from 860-900 MHz. With microwave ovens we're talking about roughly 2,500 MHz
and power in the 1,000 watt range. Boris Peisker (who used to be on the
Lyghtforce list) proved microwave oven radiation a while back. It would be
interesting to compare to Mobile Phone.

Of course, a remedy entitled Microwave is certainly less liable to raise
eyebrows among the great homeopathically-uneducated, but does it accurately
reflect the nature of the remedy? I very much doubt it.

If it comes to it, all carbon-based life forms are comprised of pretty much
the same handful of chemicals in various combinations. The variations in
proportions are mostly pretty subtle. Look at - say - humans and
chimpanzees. We have virtually identical body chemistry and share something
in excess of 95% (? I forget the precise percentage) of our genetic code,
yet nobody would mistake one for the other. If the subtle variations between
remedies comprised of virtually identical building blocks are infinite, why
should this not be the case for the imponderable remedies too according to
how they are manifested?

Homeopathy is just the first baby step outside of the materialist paradigm.
The world of immaterial substance is incomprehensibly vast - and it's all
out there to explore!

Regards
Wendy