Minutus

The problem with this report is that a few kids paralyzed are not considered problematic by industry standards,

even when the vaccine proves more dangerous than exposure to wild virus. Even when the wild virus is less lethal than

the vaccine it does not capture industry attention. What is missing is the comparison of standards applied to vaccines

as compared to standards applied to holistic protocols. This is where a lot of the hypocracy lies. One questionable
connection of ephedra with a runner's death caused the banning of the herb in the US but ongoing deaths by vaccines

are considered tolerable collateral! Without such discussing such context the low numbers of polio cases with vaccine

don't carry much meaning. Further, the description of how the vaccine virus spreads is not clear enough for a public

understanding.

t

I could not access the report. Might have been pulled already. Any other source for this?

Are you talking about the original UN report?

There are 3 resource links at the end the Natural News article.

this is one: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?N ... ak9G6OWxjq

If you read down the article it mentions the vaccine derived polio virus caused 33 polio cases and this

they say if proof the medical system is working for vaccines. A second resource from UNICEF repeats this

same number as a proof of efficacy of the vaccine.

t