Minutus

Dear Colleagues

A post from John Lee

Soroush

==

Hi

I worked at Ainsworths from 1986-2006 and at Helios since then. I studied at the College of Classical Homeopathy in the eraly 90s and knew Sheilagh Creasy fairly well in the 90s. She talked about how there was a large cluster of Cancer cases in the 60s among radionics practitioners.
There were articles written at the time as many were concerned but I can't find any references. John Ainsworth in the 80s also stated this. He did run a Pharmacy but he personally warned me against radionics when I wanted to experiment circa 1986 when I worked for him. He knew Rae and others in the 50s 60s and let's just say he did not approve! I wrote to the radionics society UK and they accept that this cluster occurred but referred to the fact that many practitioners live long lives. Other key practioners and suppliers are in denial.
From what I have found I think that using a device to make a remedy does not cause Cancer. However , sending remedies remotely, treating yourself and generally experimenting could be a risk.

John Lee

The bottom line by John Lee really doesn't make sense to me. If it is safe to make remedies, is it not safe to
give them to a client?
t

I think he is saying that constant, long term exposure could cause a problem. If that is actually the case, it would probably be something equivalent to cell phone exposure. There are so many things that appear to be able to cause cancer that I hesitate to add this to the list. At this point, I would be more concerned about constant exposure to wi-fi signals than anything else. I think that wi-fi ought to be potentized for general use.

Thanx Allen. I thought someone did potentize wi-fi, or maybe it was EMF generally.
t

I haven't kept up with all this thread, so forgive me if someone else has said this. A couple of observations.

My personal impression of homeopaths obituaries I have seen of late has been that the majority have died of cancer. ( I don't have statistics, just an impression) And we will have no idea how many of those will be machine or pharmacy remedy users anyway, so very woolly data.

When practitioners use medicating potencies to potentize tablets for patients, my feeling is that the practitioner will be be imbibing a few molecules of the remedy. Olfaction is, after all, a method of taking remedies.
No-one seems bothered about this.
And indeed I have read somewhere that frequent provers often lived long.

I suppose I find it hard to see much difference between a practitioner having frequent interaction with machine remedies, and it being 'dangerous', versus similar interactio with pharmacy remedies.
Teresa Moore

Reading comments I think one has to understand
whatJohn Lee means.
Making and dispensing a remedy using a
radionics machine by dialing from rates
should be pretty safe.
Dowsing for the patients issues and dowsing for a
remedy is a different matter. Unless the dowser understands how to ground himself and knows how to discharge negative energy it opens himself to imbalances that triggrrs latent miasms and lead to severe manifestations. What I have seen are CVA s.

Sent from my iPhone