Page 1 of 3

International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Mon May 18, 2015 3:08 am
by Cathy Lemmon
Please forgive me if it seems I am "trolling". I am not. I do read as much as I can from Minutus-- I very much enjoy this list! I simply do not have a lot of time to contribute.
This being said, I would like to share with everyone here who is interested that the deadline for "early bird" registration for Homeoprophylaxis: A Worldwide Choice, the first international conference for the promotion, education, and acceptance of Homeoprophylaxis as a proven, nontoxic disease prevention alternative is 31 May. As I've mentioned here before, for this conference-- which takes place 2-4 October, 2015 in Dallas, Texas, USA-- represents the bringing together of professionals from all over the world, including homeopaths, medical doctors, an immunologist, and an attorney. Dr. Isaac Golden, from Australia, will be our keynote speaker. Dr. Andrew Wakefield himself will also be speaking. Already, people from several different countries have registered to attend as well.
The cry out about the dangers of vaccines is ever increasing in volume. It is time people learn there truly is a nontoxic choice, when disease prevention is sought. And this choice has been around and in use since Hahnemann's time.
Please check out the website, HPWorldwideChoice for more information and to register. Or please, feel free to ask me any questions.
I will try to post more here, too, as the time gets closer.

Thank you.

In health!

- Cathy Lemmon, BA, CHP
Co-Director and -Organizer, Homeoprophylaxis: A Worldwide Choice
www.HPWorldwideChoice.com

Saupere Aude! (Dare to know!)

Re: International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Mon May 18, 2015 4:10 am
by Shannon Nelson
There's a certain irony that Sheri is so very sanguine about "infectious diseases" (which she states that she doesn't actually believe in anyway), and that she's so very certain that everything small, or at least microscopic yet alive, is benign -- but she is so very nervous about homeopathic remedies.

Sheri, I will ask again (you have never answered my previous queries about it) whether you have READ Isaac Golden's very thoroughly done research on the clinical effects of homeoprophylaxis?

Shannon

Re: International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Mon May 18, 2015 8:07 pm
by Cathy Lemmon
I will share this for the sake of those on Minutus who would like to know about Homeoprophylaxis and what it truly is. This is not saying there aren’t those who use “HP” allopathically (e.g. following a regimen of “homeopathic vaccination”)—there clearly are. But I have grown to consider these the bad apples. Science is not science if the book is closed. It begins to sound like an allopathic approach—truly, more like a religion then.
I have no argument with any other homeopath, not even those who do not use HP in their practises. It is their choice—I have no desire to “force” anything upon anyone. Indeed, I would say that, after reading what George Vithoulkas, David Little, Will Taylor, Luc DeSchepper, and others have said, they should be quite pleased to know that there is a lot of common ground with them and the homeopaths under whom I have studied HP.
But I will not “Bible-bash” this subject. Arguing only results in negative feelings on both sides and, in the end, nothing positive resulting.
Please let me say, first and foremost, that I am not out to convince anyone of anything—merely to work to help provide a more complete understanding of what Homeoprophylaxis, as I have learned and practise it, truly is. It is greatly misunderstood, both in the allopathic world as well as in the homeopathic world. To this end has transpired this conference, HPWorldwideChoice .
To think of homeopathic prophylaxis as homeopathic vaccination is misleading at best. Along with this is a true lack of understanding for what vaccination is truly for. We have been conditioned to fear common diseases—which is something I work to make clear in the presentations I have been doing throughout the United States and in Europe. This fear conditioning has come from none other than the vaccine manufacturers themselves—they are creating a market for their product. And, because we have come to the point that the vaccine makers and the doctors who prescribe and/or administer them have no liability for what they make/do, they have a corner on the market and funding to further propagate their twisted view of what should be done to “promote health”. The toxins that are in the vaccines (thimerosal/mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, MSG, etc., etc.) are what are not in what is used for Homeoprophylaxis—they are non-existent in homeopathic remedies, period. These toxins are what parents and people in general are finally learning about and are becoming more vehement about wanting to avoid at any/all cost.
Please bring in here the picture of homeopathic prophylaxis—a proven method of educating the immune system. Understand at the forefront here, again, that I am simply working to share information so that there might be a mutual understanding. Do what you want in your own homeopathic practises. But please understand that those homeopaths who approach and use “HP” with a proper understanding of homeopathy and the homeopathic view and understanding of how energetic medicine works with the body are doing what they feel is a good turn for humanity. Because of the massive propagation of vaccination, support for what can be done for this within the homeopathic umbrella may very well prove very positive for homeopathy in general.
In short, Homeoprophylaxis: A Worldwide Choice has resulted from a “meeting of minds”. Personally speaking, I have had the opportunity to visit with homeopaths not only in the United States, but also several other nations—homeopaths who have had HP in their practise for longer than Isaac Golden has been using and studying it. The people with whom I’ve met are classical homeopaths—one of these a second generation, having studied first in his homeland and then moved to Germany to continue his studies and practise of homeopathy in Hahnemann’s native land. If you look at the speakers tab on the event website, you can read further about Ravi Roy and his wife, Carola Lage-Roy as well as the other speakers who will be taking part.
Those with whom I’ve met have the desire not just to further the knowledge and acceptance of HP for what it truly is, but also to help homeopaths understand what it is—that, properly followed, HP follows homeopathic principles very closely.
The conference is set to be an educational experience. I know homeopaths in the United States who have been using HP in their practise for decades with great success, but who admit they are leery of what is going on in the state of California, for example, with the legislation, SB 277—not to mention what is going on in several other states as well. It is a largely ignorant public that believes, when it comes to the idea of preventing disease, there is no other choice than vaccines.
Is pursuing the education and acceptance of HP a money-making venture? I am sorry that there are those who view this as such. Again, there is no denying that there are always the “bad apples”. But, to be quite frank, this is something I absolutely wish I could be shouting about from the rooftops—this is something I wish everyone knew about. There is a choice.
Please know about the infamous Leptospirosis experiment that took place in Cuba in 2007/08 and the remarkable success against this horrid disease that happened when more than 2.2 million people were treated homeoprophylactically for this—the numbers went down and stayed down. And, last I heard, the general health of the nation of Cuba is beginning to improve since this was done. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study done in Brail in 2011 showed conclusively that those who were not treated with the nosode Influenzinum were three times more likely to contract the flu. Lathyrus is still being shown to be amazingly effective as a prophylactic against polio.
I’ve attached here a chart Isaac has put together that shows results that he, himself, found to be surprising. He has an advanced degree in statistics—he knows how to ask questions, how to properly analyze and question data. In this chart, he compiled numbers reflecting occurrences of diseases and other negative health issues for which there are no vaccines (including asthma, eczema, ear issues, behavioral issues) comparing occurrences between those who had been receiving Homeoprophylaxis, those who had received vaccination, those who had been treated constitutionally, and those for whom nothing was done. He had thought, clearly, that those treated constitutionally would show the best results, meaning the least occurrences of these issues. In nearly every case, however, the best results happened among those treated with HP. Why? That can be anyone’s guess. But Isaac has pointed a possibility to consider is this: that Hahnemann himself said that if you want to improve your health, go through a properly conducted proving. In a way, an HP program is, indeed, like a proving—it stimulates the entire system, not just the immune system. HP nosodes are not given with the intent to produce symptoms, of course. But the gentle stimulation to the system provided through HP would still appear to produce positive results.
I have also been studying actual disease history, finding in every case that decline began with improved sanitation, hygiene, foods. Never did it have anything to do with the introduction of a vaccine—or even an antibiotic.
Should every disease be prevented? Certainly not. The body becomes healthier as it overcomes disease—we all know this. But again, because society around us has become so conditioned to be afraid of getting sick at any cost, we have got to start somewhere, as far as educating the public that another avenue will be so much more effective.
Again, what we have today is a world conditioned to fear disease and accept allopathic vaccination. What we have in nearly every nation on the planet is a protocol set up by governmental institutions—paid for and educated by vaccine manufacturers—to ensure vaccination happens across the board, in many cases from the moment of birth (and in some cases, especially in the United States, even before birth). We have a populace conditioned to not, under any circumstances or in any way, question vaccines.
What Isaac Golden began in Australia, after studying homeoprophylaxis for years, is something to begin recognition of another choice—a homeopathically-based choice—as an alternative for disease prevention. Again, Isaac is one who is not afraid to be questioned. Indeed, he welcomes them, both from homeopaths (he has had many discussions with Vithoulkas, who still doesn’t see HP as he does) as well as those from the allopathic world. With the understanding of a classically-trained homeopath, he looked at the vaccine regimen and looked at what he had been learning about homeopathy and HP and decided the best first choice would be to put something together that people, and governments could recognize. On the surface, it appears to be a homeopathic attempt to mimic allopathic vaccination. But, when properly understood, it is anything but. It is an organized system of administration—the program I use targets only 8 diseases. In the United States, this is able to be done as a parent-administered program, under the supervision of a properly trained homeopath or health care practitioner. (Other nations, such as Germany, require administration to be done by and in the office of a homeopath or Heilpraktiker.) A booklet is provided to keep track of the nosodes/remedies used and any reactions that may occur. It is made clear to the parents that it does NOT have to be begun at birth—that is an allopathic approach. What I do is encourage moms to nurse their babies as long as they can, that this is the absolute best first line of defense for their baby. I’ve had parents not begin a program until their children are 5 or even older. And if a child is sick, then put the program on hold until the child is well. It is flexible, it is adjustable. Parents have asked for nosodes for other diseases as well. I at first work to explain to them how much better their child/ren are if they contract, say something like chicken pox naturally. But, in the end, I allow the parent to make the decision there.
By and large, the parents I am presenting the HP protocol to are very, very educated. They have done their research. They ask fantastic questions. I have every confidence that the children of these parents are off to a very bright and strong future.
What I have found is that there are many ways HP is done. I’ve seen this from Isaac, from homeopaths in the United States, the UK, Germany, Holland, and India. (My own protocol for HP that I teach people has evolved from the many professionals with whom I have visited and studied.) I don’t agree with the way all of these homeopaths approach this—some using multiple nosodes at once, some using isotopes made from the vaccines themselves, some using many doses, and more. But success is happening with this.
In the end, I am going to remain hopeful that the vaccine paradigm will be broken. It truly seems the tides are turning. We want this conference to be one where people can come and say, Wow! I had no idea! I would say that what is the best thing for people to do right now is to, at long last, learn that they have a choice. And eventually, this will move everyone ahead. Eventually, the vaccine paradigm will be a thing of the past. People will not only begin to choose something like HP, but they will also recognize they are, once again, becoming healthier as a result of not vaccinating. And, ultimately, people will begin to not question the value of allowing themselves to actually get sick now and again.
Homeopathy is for the promotion of health. Properly followed, Homeoprophylaxis fits right into this. When following proper protocols, it is safe on many levels. It is economical. It is part of whole health. This is what this conference is about—helping the public learn about this on a much larger level.
Please take the time to learn about and come to this event in October. It will be an information-packed weekend, one which will very easily influence your views of Homeoprophylaxis, and I dare say for the better.
Please let me know if you have any further questions!
In health!
- Cathy Lemmon, BA, CHP

List Owner, Homeopathy-and-SN

(http://groups.yahoo.com )
Co-Director and Organizer, Homeoprophylaxis: A Worldwide Choice

www.HPWorldwideChoice.om
Saupere Aude! (Dare to know!)

Re: International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Tue May 19, 2015 6:07 am
by Shannon Nelson
One thing I remember reading in Golden's summary, is that the children who went through his homeoprophylaxis protocol not only did not get the diseases, but they were *healthier* than the children who had not, according to the homeopathy's standard measures of health: not only absence of illnesses, but also happy, successful, etc.

I recall that one comparison he made, was between a group that was being raised in an "extra-healthy" way, with organic food but no homeoprophylaxis, with another group that was living a more mainstream life but also taking the HP protocol. There were lots of details between the two groups, but I don't remember them. Maybe someone here does… I remember Golden writes that he assumed that the "organic and etc." group would be the healthier, but in fact it was the HP group.

In other words, once again, the effect of homeopathy on the treated person is full of "side-benefits", and goes far, far beyond simple absence of target or named diseases.

Re: International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Tue May 19, 2015 2:30 pm
by Cathy Lemmon
Hi, Shannon,
I intended to share exactly this chart Isaac Golden shares in his Practitioners' Manual in the last email I sent, but it looks like it may not have come through. Indeed, he says himself that the results were quite surprising to him as well-- he had expected the constitutionally-raised and treated group to, by far, be the "healthiest" overall. But, as you recall, it was those who were treated with HP who were such overall. Isaac Golden knows statistics, knows how to analyze things, and isn't afraid to question anything, even if it seems to go against where his line of thinking is. I respect that. He doesn't directly say that it is because of HP that this group was healthier-- he leaves that door open, because he realizes there needs to be further study into this. But he presents what he found.

If you have Isaac's Practitioners' Manual, this chart is on page 92.
In health!
- Cathy Lemmon, BA, CHP

List Owner, Homeopathy-and-SN
Co-Director and Organizer, Homeoprophylaxis: A Worldwide Choice

http://www.HPWorldwideChoice.com
Saupere Aude! (Dare to know!)
---In minutus@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
One thing I remember reading in Golden's summary, is that the children who went through his homeoprophylaxis protocol not only did not get the diseases, but they were *healthier* than the children who had not, according to the homeopathy's standard measures of health: not only absence of illnesses, but also happy, successful, etc.

I recall that one comparison he made, was between a group that was being raised in an "extra-healthy" way, with organic food but no homeoprophylaxis, with another group that was living a more mainstream life but also taking the HP protocol. There were lots of details between the two groups, but I don't remember them. Maybe someone here does… I remember Golden writes that he assumed that the "organic and etc." group would be the healthier, but in fact it was the HP group.

In other words, once again, the effect of homeopathy on the treated person is full of "side-benefits", and goes far, far beyond simple absence of target or named diseases.

Re: International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Tue May 19, 2015 5:18 pm
by Soroush Ebrahimi
Especially for Sheri
Please see foot note to aphorism 33:

"A striking fact in corroboration of this is, that whilst previously to the year 1801, when the smooth scarlatina of Sydenham still occasionally prevailed epidemically among children, it attacked without exception all children who had escaped it in a former epidemic; in a similar epidemic which I witnessed in Konigslutter, on the contrary, all the children who took in time a very small dose of belladonna remained unaffected by this highly infectious infantile disease. If medicines can protect from a disease that is raging around, they must possess a vastly superior power of affecting our vital force."

Would you not agree that the Master had experimented with Homeoprophylaxis and found it to be rewarding?
Rgds

Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 19 May 2015 13:31
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: International Homeoprophylaxis ("HP") Conference - Dallas
Hi, Shannon,
I intended to share exactly this chart Isaac Golden shares in his Practitioners' Manual in the last email I sent, but it looks like it may not have come through. Indeed, he says himself that the results were quite surprising to him as well-- he had expected the constitutionally-raised and treated group to, by far, be the "healthiest" overall. But, as you recall, it was those who were treated with HP who were such overall. Isaac Golden knows statistics, knows how to analyze things, and isn't afraid to question anything, even if it seems to go against where his line of thinking is. I respect that. He doesn't directly say that it is because of HP that this group was healthier-- he leaves that door open, because he realizes there needs to be further study into this. But he presents what he found.

If you have Isaac's Practitioners' Manual, this chart is on page 92.
In health!
- Cathy Lemmon, BA, CHP

List Owner, Homeopathy-and-SN
Co-Director and Organizer, Homeoprophylaxis: A Worldwide Choice

http://www.HPWorldwideChoice.com
Saupere Aude! (Dare to know!)
---In minutus@yahoogroups.com , > wrote :

One thing I remember reading in Golden's summary, is that the children who went through his homeoprophylaxis protocol not only did not get the diseases, but they were *healthier* than the children who had not, according to the homeopathy's standard measures of health: not only absence of illnesses, but also happy, successful, etc.
I recall that one comparison he made, was between a group that was being raised in an "extra-healthy" way, with organic food but no homeoprophylaxis, with another group that was living a more mainstream life but also taking the HP protocol. There were lots of details between the two groups, but I don't remember them. Maybe someone here does… I remember Golden writes that he assumed that the "organic and etc." group would be the healthier, but in fact it was the HP group.
In other words, once again, the effect of homeopathy on the treated person is full of "side-benefits", and goes far, far beyond simple absence of target or named diseases.

Re: International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Tue May 19, 2015 8:31 pm
by Will Taylor
would you not agree that the Master had experimented with Homeoprophylaxis and found it to be rewarding?
the question here, is a call to distinguish between short-term “homeoprophylaxis,” which was developed by Hahnemann and widely used throughout homeopathic history following well-established principles utilizing the genus epidemicus determined individually in the face of a given epidemic as the simillimum of the affected population taken as one individual (see aphs. 73, 100, 101, 102 in the Organon and Hahnemann’s writings on Scaratina and the Asiatic cholera); vs. the notion of long-term “vaccination-like” prophylaxis, most often attempted with the use of nosodes obtained from the disease-as-named in a fixed manner. This cannot be equated with or disguised by assuming the name of the “homeoprophylaxis” promoted by Hahnemann, at the very least it demands its own name & needs to be evaluated on its own merits.

Re: International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 12:30 am
by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
There is a big practical and ethical difference. I already posted that a few months ago....

To have a genus epidemicus you need to wait for patient to become sick, and in a number large enough to have a valid sample and find the common remedies.
In the meantime, patients are ill and some die, even with the best homeopathic treatment.

Homeoprophylaxis, while not being individualised (and it does not claim to do so, that is why it is called Homeoprophylaxis and not Homeopathy), allows a large proportion of people not to become sick or to have the disease in a benign matter.

Being obsessive about genus epidemicus, individualised treatment of each sick person while there exists a proven effective method to prevent the appearance of illness is the equivalent of having a serial killer loose in the city but the police wants to wait for more deaths in order to find a pattern that will make the arrest easier.

What happened to Primum Non Nocere?

Joe.

Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.

"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"

www.naturamedica.co.nz

Re: International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 4:06 am
by Paulette Montoya
This disease mentioned below is " one " disease that was present. So Dr. H knew what he was prescribing for. Also, note the fact that a very small dose of Belladonna was prescribed.

Dr. H approach is not even remotely comparable to the blind prescribing of rxs at dangerously high potencies/on the schedule of HP.

Paulette
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:18:00 +0100
Subject: RE: [Minutus] Re: International Homeoprophylaxis ("HP") Conference - Dallas
Especially for Sheri
Please see foot note to aphorism 33:

"A striking fact in corroboration of this is, that whilst previously to the year 1801, when the smooth scarlatina of Sydenham still occasionally prevailed epidemically among children, it attacked without exception all children who had escaped it in a former epidemic; in a similar epidemic which I witnessed in Konigslutter, on the contrary, all the children who took in time a very small dose of belladonna remained unaffected by this highly infectious infantile disease. If medicines can protect from a disease that is raging around, they must possess a vastly superior power of affecting our vital force."
Would you not agree that the Master had experimented with Homeoprophylaxis and found it to be rewarding?
Rgds

Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 19 May 2015 13:31
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: International Homeoprophylaxis ("HP") Conference - Dallas
Hi, Shannon,
I intended to share exactly this chart Isaac Golden shares in his Practitioners' Manual in the last email I sent, but it looks like it may not have come through. Indeed, he says himself that the results were quite surprising to him as well-- he had expected the constitutionally-raised and treated group to, by far, be the "healthiest" overall. But, as you recall, it was those who were treated with HP who were such overall. Isaac Golden knows statistics, knows how to analyze things, and isn't afraid to question anything, even if it seems to go against where his line of thinking is. I respect that. He doesn't directly say that it is because of HP that this group was healthier-- he leaves that door open, because he realizes there needs to be further study into this. But he presents what he found.

If you have Isaac's Practitioners' Manual, this chart is on page 92.
In health!
- Cathy Lemmon, BA, CHP
List Owner, Homeopathy-and-SN
Co-Director and Organizer, Homeoprophylaxis: A Worldwide Choice
http://www.HPWorldwideChoice.com
Saupere Aude! (Dare to know!)
---In minutus@yahoogroups.com , > wrote :

One thing I remember reading in Golden's summary, is that the children who went through his homeoprophylaxis protocol not only did not get the diseases, but they were *healthier* than the children who had not, according to the homeopathy's standard measures of health: not only absence of illnesses, but also happy, successful, etc.
I recall that one comparison he made, was between a group that was being raised in an "extra-healthy" way, with organic food but no homeoprophylaxis, with another group that was living a more mainstream life but also taking the HP protocol. There were lots of details between the two groups, but I don't remember them. Maybe someone here does… I remember Golden writes that he assumed that the "organic and etc." group would be the healthier, but in fact it was the HP group.
In other words, once again, the effect of homeopathy on the treated person is full of "side-benefits", and goes far, far beyond simple absence of target or named diseases.

Re: International Homeoprophylaxis (HP) Conference - Dallas

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 6:15 am
by Lucy De Pieri
Unfortunately even here on the West Coast of Canada, homeopaths offering homeoprophylaxis have been attacked.
They had to take all information about homeoprophylaxis and nosodes, off their website...

Pretty sad state of affairs

Lucy

Lucy De Pieri PhD, DCH
________________________________

From: "'Dr. J Rozencwajg, NMD' jroz@ihug.co.nz [minutus]"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: International Homeoprophylaxis ("HP") Conference - Dallas
There is a big practical and ethical difference. I already posted that a few months ago....

To have a genus epidemicus you need to wait for patient to become sick, and in a number large enough to have a valid sample and find the common remedies.
In the meantime, patients are ill and some die, even with the best homeopathic treatment.

Homeoprophylaxis, while not being individualised (and it does not claim to do so, that is why it is called Homeoprophylaxis and not Homeopathy), allows a large proportion of people not to become sick or to have the disease in a benign matter.

Being obsessive about genus epidemicus, individualised treatment of each sick person while there exists a proven effective method to prevent the appearance of illness is the equivalent of having a serial killer loose in the city but the police wants to wait for more deaths in order to find a pattern that will make the arrest easier.

What happened to Primum Non Nocere?

Joe.

Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.

"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"

www.naturamedica.co.nz