Page 1 of 2
Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:15 pm
by Fran Sheffield
Interesting to see that our conversations end up on skeptic blogs:
http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2014/10 ... ebola.html
Re: Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:34 pm
by Rochelle Marsden
I’m actually quite pleased to see it there!!!!! Never thought I would ever say that!!
From:
minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 17 October 2014 22:16
To:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Skeptic Blogs
Interesting to see that our conversations end up on skeptic blogs:
http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2014/10 ... ebola.html
Re: Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:18 am
by Fran Sheffield
I just wish they had a bigger and more diverse readership.
Fran.
Re: Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:42 am
by Jean Doherty
Why don’t we play the resonances and endeavour to project them mentally to where needed.. I do not know if that can be done by Reiki. Surely if that energy is put out it may have some result. If flapping butterfly wings can produce stuff why not this.
Anyhow just a thought. Jean
Re: Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:56 am
by Tanya Marquette
I don’t regret anything I have written but am not comfortable by this skeptic site lifting our posts verbatim and printing them on their blog.
Is there something illegal about them doing that? They have certainly not acknowledged the source of what they post. But do I want
them posting my name anyway?
t
Re: Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:34 am
by Irene de Villiers
Because the xxxxxxx making list settings for minutus, made this a public list instead of one for members only, and continues to ignore the need to make member only.
So every enemy of homeopathy worldwide, is INVITED to read what we say - anonymously - and make trouble.
Re: Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:36 am
by Irene de Villiers
Brilliant thougt!
...Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
Re: Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:40 am
by Irene de Villiers
Tanya The list owner gets to make the setting about whether the list is for members only or whether any member of public can anonymously read the emails ie "public" setting.
This group has "public" setting.
I hate it with a passion, any civilized list makes people subscribe before they can read posts - but not here - whoever owns it will not make it more civilized.
Maybe if the members yell loud enough for a non-public setting, the owner may reconsider?
It is 100% their prerogative however.
........Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
Re: Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:13 pm
by Rachel
"Of course, none of the medical claims in that petition are true."
i love how they just dismiss history with the wave of a hand. no, homeopathy never had a role in any epidemic, and therefore, obviously no success. just wave it away....
________________________________
From: "Fran Sheffield
FranSheffield@homeopathyplus.com.au [minutus]"
To:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Skeptic Blogs
I just wish they had a bigger and more diverse readership.
Fran.
Re: Skeptic Blogs
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:15 pm
by Rachel
also, we're being spied upon. i assume regularly. does this group have to stay public? why not make it private?
________________________________
From: "Tanya Marquette
tamarque@earthlink.net [minutus]"
To:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Skeptic Blogs
I don’t regret anything I have written but am not comfortable by this skeptic site lifting our posts verbatim and printing them on their blog.
Is there something illegal about them doing that? They have certainly not acknowledged the source of what they post. But do I want
them posting my name anyway?
t