Page 1 of 1

Who created the new Ebola?

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 10:02 am
by Soroush Ebrahimi
From: Jane Parkin
Who Created The New Ebola? New Disease Symptoms Very Different – So Where Did It Come From?
Posted on September 10, 2014 by ChildHealthSafety

A report earlier this year from The Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) at the University of Minnesota . reports that a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows that the growing outbreak is caused by an alleged new “Ebola” strain . Lisa Schnirring | Staff Writer | CIDRAP News Apr 17, 2014.

The Jim Stone Freelance Journalist site carries an opinion piece questioning where the “new Ebola” came from and speculates about whether it is a man-made disease. What Jim Stone does not ask, is, as the “new Ebola” is new, where did the old Ebola vanish to? A new disease that just vanished and a yet further new version that popped up from nowhere?

Here is an edited version of the Jim Stone opinion article which was originally titled “Ebola Not Normal“.

Note the warning “Avoid any ‘vaccine’ like you would the disease itself.“
OPINION
New Ebola vaccine will be worthless
With 368 mutations already found, there will be no vaccine that will work. Any pushing of an ebola vaccine will be for something other than providing immunity for Ebola, and for anyone who is aware of the recent CDC bust of vaccine links to autism , that “other” is not likely to be good.

Prior to this outbreak, Ebola had a very high genetic stability and remained unchanged through multiple outbreaks. In fact, Ebola has been so stable that it was considered remarkable for this. Why then, with this outbreak, are there so many mutations of this new type, when in past outbreaks no mutations have been noted?
Additionally, this new outbreak has none of the characteristics of previous outbreaks
There is something missing in this Ebola outbreak, and it is the bloody eyes and ears, and bleeding through the skin. This time all the bleeding is internal and nothing shows outwardly. All the bloody blistered skin photos on the web are from previous outbreaks, with this particular strain people look outwardly normal up until death and die from internal bleeding, vomiting up blood and having massive stools of black goo from internal bleeding. In this way, the new Ebola is mimicking Parvo in dogs, and I would at least tenuously bet that traditional Ebola has been merged in a lab with a different virus that is known for causing only internal bleeding, possibly parvo.

This is where things may go amiss. Previously, Ebola was a stable virus that could have had a predictable cure. The current strain is mutating so rapidly that if all the recorded cases were added up and divided by the number of mutations, each mutated strain would have only infected an average of 20 people. That is a phenomenal mutation rate, which will render any vaccine attempt useless.

Watch out for any news saying how Ebola mutates continuously without mentioning that prior to this outbreak Ebola was very stable, and question why this new strain is so different from past strains, from outward symptoms, to incubation times, to mutation rates, it is all far too different for this to have happened naturally in a formerly stable virus.
There are very few pictures of people infected with this new strain, and none show the normal bleeding. Why?
Take a look at a google image search with all photos dated a year or more old, and compare them to a google image search of pictures dated to within the time frame of this outbreak and notice that for this outbreak everything is just a repeat of old ebola pictures with anything new just showing people without any blisters.

Almost all of what we are seeing is body bags which show nothing, with all other pictures showing none of the classic symptoms. Go to this picture of a man who reportedly is an Ebola victim. It shows nothing indicating he had Ebola. We seem to be seeing pictures of something that is not “ebola” Pictures dated to before this outbreak show what ebola looks like.
The “new Ebola” symptoms:
* Fever (greater than 38.6°C or 101.5°F)
* Severe headache
* Muscle pain
* Weakness
* Diarrhea
* Vomiting
* Abdominal (stomach) pain
* Lack of appetite
The “old Ebola” symptoms:
“After 3-4 days of non-specific symptoms and signs, patients typically experienced progressively severe sore throat, developed a maculopapular rash, had intractable abdominal pain, and began to bleed from multiple sites, principally the gastrointestinal tract. “

Usually, with ebola, recovery takes months and sometimes never happens completely because the liver, kidneys and other organs including the brain get damaged. Yet we see in the media pictures of ebola “survivors” that are up and about only two weeks after having it. This is not possible with “real ebola“.

The symptoms are not consistent. Recovery times are too fast, and the current CDC list of symptoms does not match the old list except when the CDC combines the new list with the old list to muddy the water. Something is amiss with this, and the new vaccine can only be bogus with so many mutated variants. There is no way any vaccine can be real. Avoid any “vaccine” like you would the disease itself.
http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/ ... come-from/

Re: Who created the new Ebola?

Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 12:18 pm
by Irene de Villiers
MY OPINION:

Clearly this rabbelrouser writer, whatever his name is,
attented the University of Bunkum and Delusions and got a PhD
(= Piled Higher and Deeper).

First of all Ebola already mutauted/changed 368 times per this same person in the same article, so what's the big deal with one more change?
Yes the current strain is different from the previous ones - it is halfway across the planet away, and the previous biggest outbreak (which this one surpasses by many factors) was in 1976.
Would you be freaked at a flu virus being different after so long?
Try the new EV-D68 - it is flu with a difference - causes children to lose their breath and suffocate.
It's no surprise in viral epidemiology.

Ebola previously was a Zaire version and this one is not a Zaire version but originates in the animals in the Sierra Leone region where the current Ebola is KNOWN to exist in the local animals.
Zaire virus outbreaks alwasy had a chimpanzee found dead from Ebola (proved later) which was butchered and eaten. In Sierra Leone, different strains were found in multiple different local animal species. STrains often adapt to host species, so it makes sense different aninals carrying it would h ave strains changed to live that way.
It is only when humans eat sick animals due to poor food availability, that Ebola transfers from LOCAL animals (with local Ebola variants) to humans in that locale. That was the origin of the current Ebola and it has been well researched, it needs no crazy inventions.

Next this fool claims Ebola maintained stability previously with no changes - this in the same breath in which he talks of 368 mutations known, and of course he totally ignores all the valid genetic research that shows the differences between past strains, though most were sub-dividions of Zaire strais not the current Sierra Leone strains. Maybe he should go learn some Geography. Africa is a big place. The Zaire strains were in Zaire and Johannesburg (South Africa) - 3620 miles away from Sierra Leone, (which for comparison is one and a half times the distance between Los Angeles and New York.)
- it is NOT next door!
It would be weird if the strains that far apart, and from animals that far apart and in different environments, had much in common!
We do not expect flu strains form far apart geographic areas to be identical either!

Much easier to invent some out of space story however with zero evidence and less credibility, and try to get famous (infamous) as a journalist with no evidence, and stories sucked out of his thumb, than to look up the facts.

His invention is a cross between Parvo and Ebola.
He claims they are similar.
Shows how he knows nothing whatsoever about virology, or either disease.

Viruses are classified according to their basic structural composition. One can splice a gene and the virus wil still be in the same classification group.
Parvo and Ebola are NOT in the same classification group.
You can not gene spice an inbetween any more than you can cross a corn stalk with a monkey and get an inbetween organism. You can get a genetically altered corn stalk or a genetically altered monkey only.

Ebola virus classification:

Family: Filoviridae (they look like very long filaments) picture:
http://lib.jiangnan.edu.cn/ASM/239-1.jpg
it is a single stranded RNA virus with an envelope around it ...unlike parvo.

It has two genera:
Genus Ebolavirus...covering all strains of Ebola.
Species: Ebola virus
Species Sudan ebolavoirus
Species Zaire ebolavirus
Species .....
etc

The other FIloviride genus is:
Genus Marbugvirus..covering all strains of Marburgh

By comparison Parvovirus classification:

Family: Parvoviridae (very small, Latin "parvus" means small)
Genus Parvovirus
There are many species, too many to list here.. the point is the structure difference.
Picture of dog one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canine_par ... ovirus.jpg
It is a single stranded DNA virus NON-enveloped, icosahedral shape.
It is totally opposite to ebola in physical structure.
The dog one is officially "Canine parvovirus2"

There is no comparison between how parvo works and how ebola works.
If they were splicable there woudl be a commonality of action somewhere.

The current outbreak of Ebola DOES have the bleediong this guy missed. It was seen on TV, but the bleeding is a minor issue in all cases and strains of ebola, it kills by DIC only - leaking blood plama out of the bloodstream, and also possible red cells.
(DIC= Disseminated intravascular coaglation)
.....unlike parvo
Parvo kills by destroying blood cells, starting with the white cells as then it can attack the red ones with no white cells to come to the rescue. It also causes heart damage. There is not even one mechanism in common.

He calls himself a "journalist" - he is an insult to true journalists and his inventions are despicable.

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."