Page 1 of 1

New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 11:39 am
by Tanya Nolte
HI All,

Interesting news item re element 117.

http://www.livescience.com/45289-superh ... 2_23110524

Cheers,
Tani

NB: Advice or suggestions offered are not a replacement for veterinary or medical treatment!
Tanya Nolte ~ 'Alternicare Health Solutions'
Classical Homoeopath ~ mAHA, mAROH, mHATO
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/1971
Mail to: altcare@aapt.net.au
Mob: 0415 150300

Re: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 3:19 pm
by Tanya Marquette
This is interesting—creating new elements artificially.
Does this make them real elements or just more product of industry?
And what does this mean for our world?
How is it known that they fill a hole in the periodic table?
t
From: mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 5:39 AM
To: Group Minutus
Subject: [Minutus] RE: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

HI All,
Interesting news item re element 117.
http://www.livescience.com/45289-superh ... 2_23110524
Cheers,
Tani
NB: Advice or suggestions offered are not a replacement for veterinary or medical treatment!
Tanya Nolte ~ 'Alternicare Health Solutions'
Classical Homoeopath ~ mAHA, mAROH, mHATO
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/1971
Mail to: altcare@aapt.net.au
Mob: 0415 150300

Re: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 3:07 am
by Angela McGuire
These new artificial elements generally tend to bury be very short-lived. They usually last just a few seconds.

Periodic table was designed In such a way that they deliberately left blanks so that they could fill in with new elements that would be discovered.

A good book that you might enjoy on the periodic table is called "The Disappearing Spoon"

It was on the New York Times bestseller list for quite some time, a few years ago.

Sent from my iPad

Re: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 8:47 am
by Tanya Marquette
It seems a big difference between discovering new elements and creating them.
t
From: mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 9:07 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] RE: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

These new artificial elements generally tend to bury be very short-lived. They usually last just a few seconds.

Periodic table was designed In such a way that they deliberately left blanks so that they could fill in with new elements that would be discovered.
A good book that you might enjoy on the periodic table is called "The Disappearing Spoon"
It was on the New York Times bestseller list for quite some time, a few years ago.

Sent from my iPad

Re: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 10:08 pm
by Vicki Satta
It sounds like Monsanto and friends know that their days are numbered and are preparing another research area where they can attempt to control the natural process of the Earth's own workings for $$$.

They're simply trying to find a new way to play God!
Donno... Joe probably knows. I don't, but I don't put anything past them as their lust for power, dominance and CASH prevails. The good news is that the Governor of Vermont signed in the first bill for making GMO labeling mandatory in his state. That is the first time they haven't won... so the people prevail.

Vicki

Re: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 10:24 pm
by Tanya Marquette
I have the same concerns as you.
Scholten’s approach based on the traveling energy patterns across the periodic table (up and down, left to right)
makes sense to me. As the elements change their electron and nuclear composition their energy pattern changes.
So he was able to anticipate characteristics of elements on the table. But creating elements quite literally out of
thin air, certainly challenges reality.
As for you point, we do know that the corporate model is to control everything on earth and patent it for profit and
control. Anything living is disses as unreal, meaningless, out of control, unstable, etc Thus real life is untrustworthy
and needs to be subordinated.
t
From: mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 9:59 AM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] RE: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!
It sounds like Monsanto and friends know that their days are numbered and are preparing another research area where they can attempt to control the natural process of the Earth's own workings for $$$.
They're simply trying to find a new way to play God!
Donno... Joe probably knows. I don't, but I don't put anything past them as their lust for power, dominance and CASH prevails. The good news is that the Governor of Vermont signed in the first bill for making GMO labeling mandatory in his state. That is the first time they haven't won... so the people prevail.
Vicki

Re: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

Posted: Mon May 12, 2014 12:27 am
by Shannon Nelson
The atomic number, which determines the placement in the periodic table, is determined by the number of protons in the nucleus. A "hole in the periodic table" means that there is an element known / named with fewer, and other(s) with more, already in the periodic table, but none has been found / named for that space, i.e. with that number of protons in its nucleus.

I hope that makes sense...

Re: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

Posted: Mon May 12, 2014 12:59 am
by Tanya Marquette
I do understand that. I just question when there is no hole in table and just new ones are being added at the end
And there is an assumption that an element should be where there is a gap.
t
From: mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 6:27 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] RE: New super-heavy element found for periodic table!

The atomic number, which determines the placement in the periodic table, is determined by the number of protons in the nucleus. A "hole in the periodic table" means that there is an element known / named with fewer, and other(s) with more, already in the periodic table, but none has been found / named for that space, i.e. with that number of protons in its nucleus.
I hope that makes sense...