Will GMO be necessary?
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:20 am
I saw this MIT Technology Review cover story on a newsstand this week.
None of us want GMO in our diets, they present reasons why it may be necessary.
While I try to buy organic when affordable and available, many times the organic fruit or vegetable doesn't look very healthy, is mottled, spotted, off color, not robust, etc. basically looks weak.
Not sure, at times, if the organic benefit outweighs what looks like a less nutritious item or if the non-organic item is actually more nutritious. Many organic items like strawberries, pineapples, bananas do taste better and less chemical.
For example, potatoes are highly sprayed with fungicides to prevent blight.
A GMO potato being tested in a lab in Ireland would make a potato resistant to blight which still occurs there and could reduce or eliminate use of fungicides.
Blight-resistant potatoes would be one of the first major foods genetically engineered to incorporate defenses against plant diseases, which annually destroy some 15 percent of the world’s agricultural harvest. Despite the heavy use of fungicides, late blight and other plant diseases ruin an estimated fifth of the world’s potatoes, a food increasingly grown in China and India. Stem rust, a fungal disease of wheat, has spread through much of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula and is now threatening the vast growing regions of central and south Asia, which produce some 20 percent of the world’s wheat. Bananas, which are a primary source of food in countries such as Uganda, are often destroyed by wilt disease. In all these cases, genetic engineering has the potential to create varieties that are far better able to withstand the onslaught.
GM potatoes could also lead to a new generation of biotech foods sold directly to consumers. Though transgenic corn, soybeans, and cotton—mostly engineered to resist insects and herbicides—have been widely planted since the late 1990s in the United States and in a smattering of other large agricultural countries, including Brazil and Canada, the corn and soybean crops go mainly into animal feed, biofuels, and cooking oils. No genetically modified varieties of rice, wheat, or potatoes are widely grown, because opposition to such foods has discouraged investment in developing them and because seed companies haven’t found ways to make the kind of money on those crops that they do from genetically modified corn and soybeans.
Also interesting comments by readers against GMO.
http://www.technologyreview.com/feature ... ied-foods/
Susan
None of us want GMO in our diets, they present reasons why it may be necessary.
While I try to buy organic when affordable and available, many times the organic fruit or vegetable doesn't look very healthy, is mottled, spotted, off color, not robust, etc. basically looks weak.
Not sure, at times, if the organic benefit outweighs what looks like a less nutritious item or if the non-organic item is actually more nutritious. Many organic items like strawberries, pineapples, bananas do taste better and less chemical.
For example, potatoes are highly sprayed with fungicides to prevent blight.
A GMO potato being tested in a lab in Ireland would make a potato resistant to blight which still occurs there and could reduce or eliminate use of fungicides.
Blight-resistant potatoes would be one of the first major foods genetically engineered to incorporate defenses against plant diseases, which annually destroy some 15 percent of the world’s agricultural harvest. Despite the heavy use of fungicides, late blight and other plant diseases ruin an estimated fifth of the world’s potatoes, a food increasingly grown in China and India. Stem rust, a fungal disease of wheat, has spread through much of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula and is now threatening the vast growing regions of central and south Asia, which produce some 20 percent of the world’s wheat. Bananas, which are a primary source of food in countries such as Uganda, are often destroyed by wilt disease. In all these cases, genetic engineering has the potential to create varieties that are far better able to withstand the onslaught.
GM potatoes could also lead to a new generation of biotech foods sold directly to consumers. Though transgenic corn, soybeans, and cotton—mostly engineered to resist insects and herbicides—have been widely planted since the late 1990s in the United States and in a smattering of other large agricultural countries, including Brazil and Canada, the corn and soybean crops go mainly into animal feed, biofuels, and cooking oils. No genetically modified varieties of rice, wheat, or potatoes are widely grown, because opposition to such foods has discouraged investment in developing them and because seed companies haven’t found ways to make the kind of money on those crops that they do from genetically modified corn and soybeans.
Also interesting comments by readers against GMO.
http://www.technologyreview.com/feature ... ied-foods/
Susan