Homeopathy per the latest edition of Veterinary Merck Manual
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:57 pm
Dear Narda,
Your name is listed below the Merck Veterinary Manual page here, as author:
Did you really write this?
If so please tell me where you studied homeopathy, as it is clear that such a school should be blacklisted - and I am very sorry if they misled you so badly. I am even more saddened that anyone should publish an unverified story with no truth in Merck Veterinary Manual in 2013, with no scientific references to the homeopathy reseach showing how it works, whatsoever - and with incorrect statements on every aspect you mention. None of what you say there aligns with the science or the theory of homeopathy - both of which are well known and well verified.
Even the basic statments made could not be further from the true situation. For example, of course dilution does not make anything a stronger medicine - and that is not how homeopathy works, nor does any textbook on it suggest such a notion.
As an acupuncturist, you must know that acupuncture works the way homeopathy does - by making use of the meridians to apply pressure to the body's nearby liquid crystal structural connective tissue, thus transmitting oscillations of specific electromagnetic frequency to the cell receptors.
Homeopaty does so by clathrates and piezoelectrical pressure rather than acupressure or acupuncture. But the final mechanism is highly comparable.
If your school of homeopathy (and presumably you did study the subject before claiming to be the expert in the Merck manual) failed to teach you about those, you can read a reasonably easy to understand explanation here:
* Third Millennium Homeopathy by Joe Rozencwajg NMD (PhD and a lot of other letters, he has several doctorates; he was a cardiologist but also is a homeopath who does homeopathy research for which he is very well known.
* The Emerging Science of Homeopathy: Complexity, Biodynamics, and Nanopharmacology by Paolo Bellavite MD and Andrea Signorini MD (This book summarizes the immense research work of others, and puts it together. The explanation is involved as it goes to the details of cell receptor behavior and requires some detailed knowledge of cell physiology an molecular biology to understand it.)
Clathrates and how they work, are not new. Spreading proaganda against homeoapthy instead, in Merck Manual is hardly fitting for a person who understands acupuncture in any way. How come you do not call acupunture a placebo? After all - one could say it is "just about sticking people with needles". I know it is not that - but your statements on homeopathy are far LESS justifiable!
As for the use of tautopathic remedies as alternatives to vaccinations (it is ignorant to call them nosodes, as nosodes are something else) , it is well documented in long term studies on children and adults over 7 years or more for study duration - as to how well those work. You'd know that if you DID study homeopathy, so it begs the questioin - How DID you become the Merck Manual expert on homeopathy? Do you have credentials other than the listed ones? If not why not?
For specific documentation of how much better the tautopathic remedies work in humans as compared with vaccines, read Isaac Golden's books. (google will find them for you)
How well they work for animals, is, in many countries, legendary - and is well known in USA as well by those who use them.
The audacity of the incorrect pronouncements in a veterinary journal begs the question - I have to wonder of you were paid to write such nonsense in the Merck manual by some vested interest?
I can think of no other explanation for the complete lack of any reference to any specific homeopathy text, school, credential or research. But I do look forward to your response to explain this.
Please explain exactly how you became the expert on homeopathy for Merck's Veterinary Manual. I am copying the entire Minutus list of homeopaths internationally and the veterinary homeopathy study groups, as I know they will be interested in just who says what about homeopathy in a formal veterinary manual - and using what references and credentials/authority in the sujbect.
I hope that you will take appropriate action to undo the damage of your signed piece on homeopathy - I shall consider publishing your reply (or lack thereof since that speaks for itself) appropriately to inform homeopaths in ALL countries of what malignant misinformation is being publishhed in USA in 2013 in our well respected profession.
I assume that if the profession of acupuncture were being similarly maligned that you might not enjoy it. You might possibly want to warn acupuncturists if someone with zero knowledge wrote something like "acupuncture is a dangerous sticking of multiple needles that might be dirty and which could do nothing besides a placebo or infection result" - or something equally misleading or incorrect, in a manual on line for international use. THAT would be just as misleading as what Merck manual says YOU wrote, supposedly about homeopathy.
I see from this:
http://csuvets.colostate.edu/pain/Robinson.htm
that you are in CO state, thus live under CO law.
Are you aware of the "Colorado Natural Health Consumer Protection Act" which you may well be violating by "deceptive practices" (explained in the act) and which specifically upholds the (unlicensed) practice of homeopathy?
Are you also aware that US law forbids the maligning of another health profession under the antitrust laws?
(see Goldfarb vs Virginia State Bar that learned professions are not exempt from antitrust suits. also 1980 Wilkes suit that was upheld by the US Supreme court in 1990, and others.)
I look forward to your reply, and suggest you get someone with a D.Vet.Hom degree to rewrite the homeopathy section in the Merck manual.
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
Your name is listed below the Merck Veterinary Manual page here, as author:
Did you really write this?
If so please tell me where you studied homeopathy, as it is clear that such a school should be blacklisted - and I am very sorry if they misled you so badly. I am even more saddened that anyone should publish an unverified story with no truth in Merck Veterinary Manual in 2013, with no scientific references to the homeopathy reseach showing how it works, whatsoever - and with incorrect statements on every aspect you mention. None of what you say there aligns with the science or the theory of homeopathy - both of which are well known and well verified.
Even the basic statments made could not be further from the true situation. For example, of course dilution does not make anything a stronger medicine - and that is not how homeopathy works, nor does any textbook on it suggest such a notion.
As an acupuncturist, you must know that acupuncture works the way homeopathy does - by making use of the meridians to apply pressure to the body's nearby liquid crystal structural connective tissue, thus transmitting oscillations of specific electromagnetic frequency to the cell receptors.
Homeopaty does so by clathrates and piezoelectrical pressure rather than acupressure or acupuncture. But the final mechanism is highly comparable.
If your school of homeopathy (and presumably you did study the subject before claiming to be the expert in the Merck manual) failed to teach you about those, you can read a reasonably easy to understand explanation here:
* Third Millennium Homeopathy by Joe Rozencwajg NMD (PhD and a lot of other letters, he has several doctorates; he was a cardiologist but also is a homeopath who does homeopathy research for which he is very well known.
* The Emerging Science of Homeopathy: Complexity, Biodynamics, and Nanopharmacology by Paolo Bellavite MD and Andrea Signorini MD (This book summarizes the immense research work of others, and puts it together. The explanation is involved as it goes to the details of cell receptor behavior and requires some detailed knowledge of cell physiology an molecular biology to understand it.)
Clathrates and how they work, are not new. Spreading proaganda against homeoapthy instead, in Merck Manual is hardly fitting for a person who understands acupuncture in any way. How come you do not call acupunture a placebo? After all - one could say it is "just about sticking people with needles". I know it is not that - but your statements on homeopathy are far LESS justifiable!
As for the use of tautopathic remedies as alternatives to vaccinations (it is ignorant to call them nosodes, as nosodes are something else) , it is well documented in long term studies on children and adults over 7 years or more for study duration - as to how well those work. You'd know that if you DID study homeopathy, so it begs the questioin - How DID you become the Merck Manual expert on homeopathy? Do you have credentials other than the listed ones? If not why not?
For specific documentation of how much better the tautopathic remedies work in humans as compared with vaccines, read Isaac Golden's books. (google will find them for you)
How well they work for animals, is, in many countries, legendary - and is well known in USA as well by those who use them.
The audacity of the incorrect pronouncements in a veterinary journal begs the question - I have to wonder of you were paid to write such nonsense in the Merck manual by some vested interest?
I can think of no other explanation for the complete lack of any reference to any specific homeopathy text, school, credential or research. But I do look forward to your response to explain this.
Please explain exactly how you became the expert on homeopathy for Merck's Veterinary Manual. I am copying the entire Minutus list of homeopaths internationally and the veterinary homeopathy study groups, as I know they will be interested in just who says what about homeopathy in a formal veterinary manual - and using what references and credentials/authority in the sujbect.
I hope that you will take appropriate action to undo the damage of your signed piece on homeopathy - I shall consider publishing your reply (or lack thereof since that speaks for itself) appropriately to inform homeopaths in ALL countries of what malignant misinformation is being publishhed in USA in 2013 in our well respected profession.
I assume that if the profession of acupuncture were being similarly maligned that you might not enjoy it. You might possibly want to warn acupuncturists if someone with zero knowledge wrote something like "acupuncture is a dangerous sticking of multiple needles that might be dirty and which could do nothing besides a placebo or infection result" - or something equally misleading or incorrect, in a manual on line for international use. THAT would be just as misleading as what Merck manual says YOU wrote, supposedly about homeopathy.
I see from this:
http://csuvets.colostate.edu/pain/Robinson.htm
that you are in CO state, thus live under CO law.
Are you aware of the "Colorado Natural Health Consumer Protection Act" which you may well be violating by "deceptive practices" (explained in the act) and which specifically upholds the (unlicensed) practice of homeopathy?
Are you also aware that US law forbids the maligning of another health profession under the antitrust laws?
(see Goldfarb vs Virginia State Bar that learned professions are not exempt from antitrust suits. also 1980 Wilkes suit that was upheld by the US Supreme court in 1990, and others.)
I look forward to your reply, and suggest you get someone with a D.Vet.Hom degree to rewrite the homeopathy section in the Merck manual.
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."