Re: how we receive case-information
Posted: Sun May 05, 2002 1:12 pm
Dear Lisa,
I will agree with you on only point. That is that when an institution becomes impersonal and uncaring, the climate tends to develop negativity. Further, in public schools' the conflicts that arise come from the contradictions between what the institution is doing and the real needs of the students. It is certainly true that smaller schools, or classrooms, make it easier to do one-on-one work with students. But this is far from the whole truth. Homeogeneity in this day and age is usually a code word and an excuse for pure and blatant racism. The same argument has been used against women, and every other group of people in our culture for that matter. I do not want to take minutus time with a long analysis of this, but suffice it to say there is a huge body of material describing the effects of such stuctures.
My concern here is the implicit racism and prejudice in your comments. Multiculturalism is NOT the cause of the problems in your public school. Racism is the illness. And the institutional racism that was probably operative in your school is part and parcel of the attitudes of the administration, perpetrated throught the teachers with students reacting.
You speak of how one receives the case. I think you did not receive that case very well. Despite the feelings you may have had as a young person, I would encourage you, as an adult now, to review the data with an unprejudiced eye perhaps using much of the material that educational research has made easily available to us all. If you would like some material references, I would be happy to send them to you privately. The question your comments raise for me is how do you deal with heterogenity in your cases? Or do you hand a shingle out that says 'only people like me need apply?'
tanya
I will agree with you on only point. That is that when an institution becomes impersonal and uncaring, the climate tends to develop negativity. Further, in public schools' the conflicts that arise come from the contradictions between what the institution is doing and the real needs of the students. It is certainly true that smaller schools, or classrooms, make it easier to do one-on-one work with students. But this is far from the whole truth. Homeogeneity in this day and age is usually a code word and an excuse for pure and blatant racism. The same argument has been used against women, and every other group of people in our culture for that matter. I do not want to take minutus time with a long analysis of this, but suffice it to say there is a huge body of material describing the effects of such stuctures.
My concern here is the implicit racism and prejudice in your comments. Multiculturalism is NOT the cause of the problems in your public school. Racism is the illness. And the institutional racism that was probably operative in your school is part and parcel of the attitudes of the administration, perpetrated throught the teachers with students reacting.
You speak of how one receives the case. I think you did not receive that case very well. Despite the feelings you may have had as a young person, I would encourage you, as an adult now, to review the data with an unprejudiced eye perhaps using much of the material that educational research has made easily available to us all. If you would like some material references, I would be happy to send them to you privately. The question your comments raise for me is how do you deal with heterogenity in your cases? Or do you hand a shingle out that says 'only people like me need apply?'
tanya