Re: Homeopaths become as one
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:42 pm
Domenic,
I absolutely agree with you!
This was what I meant originally when I said the homeopathic community has got to decide how we will address this and other situations and we must unite.
My school (the British Institute) teaches an entry level Hahnemannian Homeopathy. I have always felt a good foundation will allow someone to go out and practice they way 'they' feel they can do the best job. Yes, some of our students have chosen combos but I believe most of our students stick to 'one' remedy and much more 'classical'/'clinical' homeopathy.
And, I know someone said the two shall not meet, but I am not sure I agree with that.
Hahnemann was a clinician first, I we look at the center of the disease state and aim for that we can vary with more or less of the mental influence depending on the case.
With more 'physical' cases I tend to go low and much more slowly, and for more mental centered cases I tend to go higher - but I do treat on variations of that depending on the patient and their sensitivities.
We are homeopaths - let's start by agreeing we treat "Similar to the Pathology"!
Now we can move from there?
Can we next agree on the Organon? Certainly as a good foundation for study?
Maria
________________________________
From: "domenicstanghini"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 5:54:58 AM
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Homeopaths become as one (was UK - MEASLES HITS THE HEADLINES AGAIN)
FWIW....We are not going to agree on this topic and thats the problem...there is no unified front....so the Homeopathic "unified" disease lingers on EACH Homeopathic practitioner as they are still stuck in a Collective unconsious miasm.
And I am NOT picking on any religion for good or bad.....If one goes to wikipedia and searchs Hinduism or Buddhism we find that their are many different ways to practice religion and they all live together with one another beside one another supporting the others path as unique. their apparent differences are tolerated as each one has a natural inclination to practice "enlightenment" based on their natural proclivity. there is no condemnation of their unique path. Add to this the many different ways to practice Christianity and there are many, many ways. Add to this the many different ways to practice Yoga, Martial Arts, Meditation etc. etc. etc. All of them have one thing in common. They (as Dr. Joe says) check their ego at the door. the ego fractures and divides and separates. Oneness embraces all. Homeopaths as humans need to learn the lessons that others have learned, like those mentioned above, the chiropractors etc.....to have a unified front. However, under the Homeopathic umbrellas there are many purist differences.
So we want to treat unique individuals using unique medicines and yet we want to DENY others that have somehow found a unique way to use homeopathic medicines in a unique way (muscle testing, multiple remedies, drainage, combos, doc of signatures etc etc)??? Coming together is the answer not separating, denying, fragmenting.
Best Wishes to all Domenic
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , Shannon Nelson wrote:
I absolutely agree with you!
This was what I meant originally when I said the homeopathic community has got to decide how we will address this and other situations and we must unite.
My school (the British Institute) teaches an entry level Hahnemannian Homeopathy. I have always felt a good foundation will allow someone to go out and practice they way 'they' feel they can do the best job. Yes, some of our students have chosen combos but I believe most of our students stick to 'one' remedy and much more 'classical'/'clinical' homeopathy.
And, I know someone said the two shall not meet, but I am not sure I agree with that.
Hahnemann was a clinician first, I we look at the center of the disease state and aim for that we can vary with more or less of the mental influence depending on the case.
With more 'physical' cases I tend to go low and much more slowly, and for more mental centered cases I tend to go higher - but I do treat on variations of that depending on the patient and their sensitivities.
We are homeopaths - let's start by agreeing we treat "Similar to the Pathology"!
Now we can move from there?
Can we next agree on the Organon? Certainly as a good foundation for study?
Maria
________________________________
From: "domenicstanghini"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 5:54:58 AM
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Homeopaths become as one (was UK - MEASLES HITS THE HEADLINES AGAIN)
FWIW....We are not going to agree on this topic and thats the problem...there is no unified front....so the Homeopathic "unified" disease lingers on EACH Homeopathic practitioner as they are still stuck in a Collective unconsious miasm.
And I am NOT picking on any religion for good or bad.....If one goes to wikipedia and searchs Hinduism or Buddhism we find that their are many different ways to practice religion and they all live together with one another beside one another supporting the others path as unique. their apparent differences are tolerated as each one has a natural inclination to practice "enlightenment" based on their natural proclivity. there is no condemnation of their unique path. Add to this the many different ways to practice Christianity and there are many, many ways. Add to this the many different ways to practice Yoga, Martial Arts, Meditation etc. etc. etc. All of them have one thing in common. They (as Dr. Joe says) check their ego at the door. the ego fractures and divides and separates. Oneness embraces all. Homeopaths as humans need to learn the lessons that others have learned, like those mentioned above, the chiropractors etc.....to have a unified front. However, under the Homeopathic umbrellas there are many purist differences.
So we want to treat unique individuals using unique medicines and yet we want to DENY others that have somehow found a unique way to use homeopathic medicines in a unique way (muscle testing, multiple remedies, drainage, combos, doc of signatures etc etc)??? Coming together is the answer not separating, denying, fragmenting.
Best Wishes to all Domenic
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , Shannon Nelson wrote: